SKU: 45669803005

Diode Dynamics 39mm HP6 LED Bulb LED - Blue (Single)

Sale price$14.40 Regular price$16.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $4.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 18 - Aug 23

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Diode Dynamics 39mm HP6 LED Bulb LED - Blue (Single)Features Direct replacement for factory 39mm festoon bulb Increased output with LED appearance Plug and play simple installation Overview Design. The 39mm HP6 LED bulb is a direct replacement for any 39mm size bulb commonly found in door lights dome lights and trunk lights in many vehicles. Populated with eight high power LEDs arranged in an omnidirectional pattern the HP6 upgrades the factory yellowish incandescent bulb to a more modern LED

Features Direct replacement for factory 39mm festoon bulb Increased output with LED appearance Plug and play simple installation Overview Design. The 39mm HP6 LED bulb is a direct replacement for any 39mm-size bulb commonly found in door lights dome lights and trunk lights in many vehicles. Populated with eight high-power LEDs arranged in an omnidirectional pattern the HP6 upgrades the factory yellowish incandescent bulb to a more modern LED appearance while providing far more light output than the factory bulb. Thanks to the frosted cover the HP6 provides even light distribution and a clean factory-style appearance. With its durable metal terminals it will fit snugly in the socket and its light weight means it won't vibrate loose over time. Reliability. Unlike other bulbs on the market this bulb is built with constant-current circuitry along with transient suppression. That means this bulb will last for years not months with no flickering or failure. And like every Diode Dynamics product it's backed by an industry-leading three-year replacement warranty. Brightness. With 140 lumens of true measured output the HP6 LED will provide far more light output than your original 39mm-sized bulb. All Diode Dynamics LED lighting is rated with accurate measured lumen figures not calculations or guesses. We test the true output in-house and provide you the real numbers to compare. Colors. In addition to vibrant colors of blue and red the HP6 is available in a cool white 6000K option as well. Whether you want a modern cool white appearance or a color to show off your unique style we have the color to fit your need!

Installation Instructions

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
2002-2013 Cadillac Escalade Base
2009-2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid
2010-2013 Cadillac Escalade Hybrid Platinum
2011-2013 Cadillac Escalade Luxury
2008-2013 Cadillac Escalade Platinum
2011-2013 Cadillac Escalade Premium
2004-2010 Cadillac SRX Base
2010 Cadillac SRX Luxury
2010 Cadillac SRX Performance
2010 Cadillac SRX Premium
2005-2011 Cadillac STS Base
2008-2009 Cadillac STS Platinum
2006-2009 Cadillac STS V
2004 Chevrolet Colorado Base
2004,2006-2008 Chevrolet Colorado LS
2006-2012 Chevrolet Colorado LT
2004-2005 Chevrolet Colorado Sport
2004-2005 Chevrolet Colorado Sport LS
2006-2012 Chevrolet Colorado WT
2004-2005 Chevrolet Colorado Z71
2004-2005 Chevrolet Colorado Z71 LS
2004-2005 Chevrolet Colorado Z85
2004-2005 Chevrolet Colorado Z85 LS
2005-2009 Chevrolet Equinox LS
2005-2009 Chevrolet Equinox LT
2008-2009 Chevrolet Equinox LTZ
2008-2009 Chevrolet Equinox Sport
2003-2014 Chevrolet Express 1500 Base
2003-2014 Chevrolet Express 1500 LS
2006-2014 Chevrolet Express 1500 LT
2003-2016 Chevrolet Express 2500 Base
2003-2016 Chevrolet Express 2500 LS
2006-2016 Chevrolet Express 2500 LT
2003-2016 Chevrolet Express 3500 Base
2003-2016 Chevrolet Express 3500 LS
2006-2016 Chevrolet Express 3500 LT
2000-2005 Chevrolet Impala Base
2000-2005 Chevrolet Impala LS
2003 Chevrolet Impala LS Sport
2003-2005 Chevrolet Impala Police
2004-2005 Chevrolet Impala SS
2000-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Competition
2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Sport
2005-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LT
2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LTZ
2000-2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS
2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS 35th Anniversary Edition
2002 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Dale Earnhardt Signature Edition
2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS High Sport
2003 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Pace Car
1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Base
1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LS
1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT
2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 HD LS
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 HD LT
1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 Base
1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 LS
1999-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 LT
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD Base
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LS
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD LT
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 Base
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 LS
2001-2002 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 LT
2005-2007 Chrysler 300 Base
2005-2010 Chrysler 300 C
2005-2010 Chrysler 300 C SRT8
2005-2010 Chrysler 300 Limited
2008-2009 Chrysler 300 LX
2010 Chrysler 300 S
2009 Chrysler 300 Signature Series
2005-2010 Chrysler 300 Touring
2013-2014 Dodge Avenger R/T
2013-2014 Dodge Avenger SE
2013-2014 Dodge Avenger SXT
1999-2000 Ford F-150 Base
2010-2014 Ford F-150 FX2
2004,2010-2014 Ford F-150 FX4
2000-2003,2010-2012 Ford F-150 Harley-Davidson Edition
2001-2003,2010-2014 Ford F-150 King Ranch
1999-2004,2010-2014 Ford F-150 Lariat
2011 Ford F-150 Lariat Limited
1999-2003 Ford F-150 Lightning
2013-2014 Ford F-150 Limited
2010-2014 Ford F-150 Platinum
2004,2010-2014 Ford F-150 STX
2010-2014 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor
1999-2004,2010-2014 Ford F-150 XL
1999-2004,2010-2014 Ford F-150 XLT
2010-2012 Ford Fusion Hybrid
2010-2012 Ford Fusion S
2010-2012 Ford Fusion SE
2010-2012 Ford Fusion SEL
2010-2012 Ford Fusion Sport
2003-2014 Ford Mustang Base
2012-2013 Ford Mustang Boss 302
2008-2009 Ford Mustang Bullitt
2003-2014 Ford Mustang GT
2003-2004 Ford Mustang Mach 1
2007-2008 Ford Mustang Shelby GT
2007-2014 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
2008-2009 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR
2003-2004 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra
2003 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra 10th Anniversary
2008-2009 Hummer H3 Adventure
2008-2010 Hummer H3 Alpha
2006-2010 Hummer H3 Base
2009 Hummer H3 Championship Series
2008-2009 Hummer H3 Luxury
2007-2009 Hummer H3 X
2001-2006 Hyundai Elantra GLS
2001-2006 Hyundai Elantra GT
2006 Hyundai Elantra Limited
2005 Hyundai Santa Fe Base
2005-2006 Hyundai Santa Fe GLS
2006 Hyundai Santa Fe Limited
2005 Hyundai Santa Fe LX
2004-2006 Pontiac GTO Base
2014 Ram 1500 Big Horn
2014 Ram 1500 Express
2014 Ram 1500 HFE
2014 Ram 1500 Laramie
2014 Ram 1500 Laramie Limited
2014 Ram 1500 Laramie Longhorn
2014 Ram 1500 Lone Star
2014 Ram 1500 Outdoorsman
2014 Ram 1500 SLT
2014 Ram 1500 Special Service
2014 Ram 1500 Sport
2014 Ram 1500 Tradesman
2006-2015 Toyota Tacoma Base
2006-2015 Toyota Tacoma Pre Runner
2015 Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro
2006-2013 Toyota Tacoma X-Runner
2007-2012 Toyota Yaris Base
2012-2017 Toyota Yaris L
2012-2017 Toyota Yaris LE
2007-2009 Toyota Yaris S
2012-2017 Toyota Yaris SE
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 45669803005

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jay
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020
P
Verified Purchase
Paco
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 4
Time will tell.
Format: Paperback
The New Chronology, the unorthodox historical time frame upon which this book is based, may be regarded by Professor Kitchen and other expert scholars in this field as 'one hundred per cent rubbish' but that does not prevent this book from being a very interesting and enjoyable read. As to the correctness or otherwise of the theory advanced, only time will tell.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2013

recommand products