Pay in installments of $179.01 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 27 - Oct 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
23238 be xl k fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Abdichtung: beidseitig Synonym: 0651440820000 23238 BE K Befestigungshlse: AH3238G Freiraumueres Breitenmae: B a min 21 mm Minimale fr Hlse Bezugsdrehzahl: 1. 070 1 min Gewicht: 44810 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 1. 990 1 min Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmiernutueres Breitenma: 17,7 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 340,00 BE Maximum Capacity Design Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Synonym: 0651440820000 23238-BE-K |
| Befestigungshülse: AH3238G |
| FreiraumÄußeres Breitenmaße: B a min 21 mm Minimale für Hülse |
| Bezugsdrehzahl: 1.070 1/min |
| Gewicht: 44810 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 1.990 1/min |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaß: 17,7 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 340,00 |
| BE Maximum Capacity Design |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1990.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 120,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 120,00 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-11 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 47.5 |
| Innenmaße: mm 190,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 1740000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 2400000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "1070.0000" |
| Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung |
| XL X-Life |
| AH3238G Befestigungshülse |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 200 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 2.400.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 1.740.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 206.000 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Durchmesser Schmierkanal: 9,5 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 1.740.000 N |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 1,98 |
| Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor: 2,94 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 206.000 N |
| Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y: 0,34 |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 3 mm |
| Minimale FreiraumÄußeres Breitenmaß für Hülse: 21 mm |
| Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 207 mm |
| Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse: 206 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 4 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 2.400.000 N |
| Statischer Axiallastfaktor: 1,93 |
| T max 200 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Y 0 1,93 Statischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 1 1,98 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| Y 2 2,94 Dynamischer Axiallastfaktor |
| d =a min 207 mm Minimaler Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =b min 206 mm Minimaler Freiraum-Ø für Hülse |
| d =s 9,5 mm Durchmesser Schmierkanal |
| e 0,34 Grenzwert für Fa/Fr für die Anwendbarkeit der versch. Werte der Faktoren X und Y |
| n G 1.990 1/min Grenzdrehzahl |
| n s 17,7 mm SchmiernutÄußeres Breitenmaße: |
| n ϑr 1.070 1/min Bezugsdrehzahl |
| r a max 3 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 4 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 44,81 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
This spin-off debut is a satisfying fix my fellow cozy flapper-era amateur-sleuth addicts!
Format: Kindle
4.25
I have no excuse. I’ve never read or listened to “The Scottish Ladies' Detective Agency” even though somebody physically gave me the book. In my defense, my kindle app and audiobooks are more friendly for ADHD and pain management and I haven’t read a physical book in years.
I was starting fresh with Lady Poppy and this first book launches a spinoff series. Who doesn’t love a historic mystery, especially set in Scotland? This has many of the hallmarks of a series in the genre and I never know whether to complain about the repetition—or even near clones—or celebrate the opportunity to feed my addiction.
In some respects, I found this refreshing because Poppy is wealthy. It seems like every other female sleuth in the 1920s and 30s has an aristocratic (or aristocratic adjacent) background but is now dirt poor. There are enough stresses about money these days that I prefer to focus on the murder.
This is a tangled web of a story and I thought it clever and I liked Poppy if for no other reason than she has a fantastic lab and appreciates him (and other dogs). Of course, Major Charlie (extra points for the awesome name) saves the day a time or two. Oh and Poppy having a law degree, even when women couldn’t practice law, was a great asset and very cool. That said, if she wasn’t a Lady and very attractive, she would not have gotten away with her brazen interference (even in comparison to other amateur sleuths).
In terms of the audiobook version, the narrator was good in most respects. The voice of the handsome inspector (among other male characters) was so deep and low that it drove me a little crazy. Lady Constance also sounded masculine and I had to stop and think every time I heard that voice which was contrary to the character. Overall, she did a good job on the various Scottish accents, including Poppy’s sophisticated mix of the King ‘s English and a Scottish lilt.
Otherwise, this mystery was clever and I’m sad that I have to wait for the next one. I would wait for several so that I could finally binge them, but I’m not that strong.
P.S. Apparently, neither Lydia Travers nor “The Scottish Ladies' Detective Agency” are even recognized by Libby (which recognizes practically every author) and the books are only available through Kindle Unlimited or buying them or the audiobooks, thus the reason I have not read them. Maybe one day!
I am reviewing advanced copies of this book and audiobook given to me by the publisher. All views are strictly my own. .
#DeathattheHighlandLoch #NetGalley #bookreview #ADHDreader #lydiatravers #Scottishladydetective #Scotland #historicmystery
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!!!
Format: Kindle
I'm so excited to begin a new series by Lydia Travers! I have missed our Maud McIntyre, but Lady Poppy is a delightful! Ms Travers weaves an intriguing tale with interesting characters and the hope of a sweet, budding romance. Do yourself a favor and get it. You Will enjoy reading it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 10, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Unbelievable disappointment
Format: Kindle
The main character is silly, insipid, one dimensional, and completely unbelievable. A murder victim is discovered and for some reason she immediately believes she is the most qualified person to solve the crime. The supposed professional, the local inspector, let's her walk all over him. I couldn't make myself finish it and certainly won't be reading any more in the series.
As far as the audible version, the narrator needs to study American accents more, maybe actually engage in conversation with Americans before trying the accent again. The most cringe worthy narration I've ever heard.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 7, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great read
Format: Kindle
I really like this one. Even though the Poppy character is a bit stubborn and won’t accept she is not really a detective, yet. The rest of the characters and plot delightful. I’m already looking forward to the next one.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 12, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Enjoyable
Format: Kindle
It is a good read. I enjoy the leafing characters. The plot was well done.
But it could use a bit of better editing. There were several mistakes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 31, 2025