Pay in installments of $6.22 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
glucosil gelVitakruid GlucoSil gel De voordelen van GlucoSil voor je op een rijtje: Smeerbaar dus direct doeltreffend op behoevende plek Organisch silicium voor optimale doorlaatbaarheid De unieke combinatie van glucosamine, chondrotine en MSM Aangevuld met kruiden voor verbeterde werking Smeerbare gel Smeerbaar dus direct doeltreffend op behoevende plek Het probleem met orale suppletie is dat het lichaam zelf moet uitzoeken op welke plek in het lichaam de
Vitakruid GlucoSil gelDe voordelen van GlucoSil voor je op een rijtje:
- Smeerbaar dus direct doeltreffend op behoevende plek
- Organisch silicium voor optimale doorlaatbaarheid
- De unieke combinatie van glucosamine, chondroïtine en MSM
- Aangevuld met kruiden voor verbeterde werking
Smeerbare gel Smeerbaar dus direct doeltreffend op behoevende plek
Het probleem met orale suppletie is dat het lichaam zelf moet uitzoeken op welke plek in het lichaam de nutriënten gewenst zijn. Binnen het proces van het lokaliseren van de juiste plek gaan binnen het lichaam een hoop van de effectieve nutriënten verloren. Met een smeerbare gel verhelp je dit probleem. De nutriënten breng je direct aan waar ze voor jouw gevoel nodig zijn. Op deze manier ondervindt de behoevende plek optimaal effect van de verschillende nutriënten.
Optimale doorlaatbaarheid Organisch silicium voor optimale doorlaatbaarheid
Organisch silicium (methylsilanol) heeft een dubbele rol. Silicium heeft op zichzelf al een werking, maar veel belangrijker, binnen deze formule fungeert het als zogenoemde carrier. Dat houdt in dat het silicium zich bindt aan andere moleculen waardoor de hele substantie makkelijk door de huid kan dringen. Op die manier ondersteunt organisch silicium de stoffen glucosamine, chondroïtine en MSM in hun werking.
Unieke combinatie De unieke combinatie van glucosamine, chondroïtine en MSM
De actieve ingrediënten van dit product zijn glucosamine, chondroïtine en MSM. Dit vloeibare mengsel bestaat voor minimaal 2% uit glucosamine, bevat ongeveer 1% MSM en chondroïtine is voor 0,5% vertegenwoordigd. Deze doseringen lijken misschien op het oog laag, maar kijkend naar vergelijkbare producten zijn het uitstekende waarden. Bovendien bevatten de meeste gels één of hooguit twee van bovenstaande effectieve nutrienten. GlucoSil is met de combinatie van glucosamine, chondroïtine en MSM absoluut uniek op de huidige markt!
Betere werking kruiden Aangevuld met kruiden voor verbeterde werking
De zogenoemde etherische oliën in dit product hebben naast een verzachtend effect ook de eigenschap om makkelijk de huid door te dringen. Hierdoor bereiken de hoofdingrediënten sneller de behoevende plek. Daarnaast heeft het mengsel van thymolie, gaultheria olie, thymvulgolie, lavendelolie, eucalyptusolie en bonenkruidolie een vriendelijke werking op de huid. Ohja, en de bloemen- en kruidenmix ruikt ook gewoon heel erg lekker!
Ingrediënten (INCI)
Aqua, Organisch silicium, Glucosaminesulfaat, Chondroïtinesulfaat, MSM, etherische oliën: Satureia montana, Thymus satureoides, Gaultheria procumbens, Thymus vulgaris CT thujanol, Lavendula burnatti CT super, Eucalyptus polybractea CT.
Gebruik
Drie keer per dag cirkelvormig op de spieren en gewrichten inmasseren. Tenzij anders geadviseerd.
Niet gebruiken tijdens de eerste drie maanden van de zwangerschap.
Bewaaradvies
Droog, buiten het bereik van zonlicht en op kamertemperatuur (15-25°C) bewaren. Niet in de koelkast of naast een toestel met een sterk elektromagnetisch veld bewaren.
Waarschuwingen
Niet gebruiken tijdens de eerste drie maanden van de zwangerschap. Handen goed wassen na gebruik. Bevat etherische oliën. Contact met ogen of slijmvliezen vermijden. Buiten bereik en zicht van jonge kinderen houden.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame.
What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools
He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible.
Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur.
Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life.
The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian.
Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith.
You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error.
BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
★★★★★ 5
Good experience
Format: Paperback
It was all good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Love the Edition and Footnotes; Don't need the Cultural Criticisms
Format: Paperback
The layout of the book and the footnotes are each great. What mars the book, unfortunately, is the editor's need to make simplistic statements about cultural elements. Several times, for example, he addresses "feminism," even using the term "Franken-feminists" in a puerile manner at one point. As too many of these conservative Catholics do, he simplifies and comments about modern culture without nuance. In this case, it is simply unprofessional and inaccurate (i) to not capture the myriad differences in feminist thought (many of which he and his readers would accept) and (ii) thereby to make all feminists the same (e.g,, assuming the feminists of the 1970's are the same as today's.) This is all unfortunate because when he is just addressing the literary elements of the book, his comments are wonderful and helpful to the reader.
Any reader should know that this presentation will be tilted in an unsophisticated and simplistic way toward a traditional Catholic view (a view that can indeed be defended well while still being careful and charitable to critics). With that caveat, he (or she) should still buy it and garner a good edition of the text.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2024
recommand products
Mobilize Premium Gelly Wallet Book Case Samsung Galaxy S24+ 5G Green
20.99
Mobilize Lanyard Gelly Case For Samsung Galaxy A05S Pastel Purple
18.99
Mobilize Classic Gelly Wallet Book Case Oneplus Nord N30 Se/Oppo A79 5G Black
19.99
Mobilize Classic Gelly Wallet Book Case Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Black
19.99
Otterbox React Series Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra 5G Clear
24.99