Pay in installments of $18.90 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
w6207 2rs1 skfTechnische Basisdaten Abdichtung: Abdichtung: beidseitig Auendurchmesser: 72 mm Berechnungsfaktor: f0: 13. 9 Abdichtung: beidseitig schleifende Abdichtung Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 0. 655 kN Gewicht: 278 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 6 000 r min Herstellungsland: Japan Matoleranzen: Normal Minimallastfaktor: kr0. 03 Rundlauftoleranz: Normal Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten 72 mm Auendurchmesser Anzahl der Reihen 1 Art der Abdichtung:
Technische Basisdaten
| Abdichtung: Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Außendurchmesser: 72 mm |
| Berechnungsfaktor: f0: 13.9 |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig schleifende Abdichtung |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 0.655 kN |
| Gewicht: 278 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 6 000 r/min |
| Herstellungsland: Japan |
| Maßtoleranzen: Normal |
| Minimallastfaktor: kr0.03 |
| Rundlauftoleranz: Normal |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 72 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Art der Abdichtung: Kontakt |
| Außendurchmesser 72 mm |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 22.1 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 22.1 kN |
| Einfüllnuten Ohne |
| Einzelgewicht 0.278 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 6 000 r/min |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Passungsanordnung Kein(e) |
| Schmierstoff: Fett |
| Statische Tragzahl 15.3 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 15.3 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171504 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-08-01 |
| max.46.5 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
| min.1.1 mm Kantenabstand |
| min.41.5 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
| ≈47.6 mm Eindrehungsdurchmesser |
| ≈47.6 mm Schulterdurchmesser |
| ≈64.83 mm Eindrehungsdurchmesser |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Sleek and spacious
Color: Black, Size: Small
Perfect for those who have multiple remotes and need a single place to stow them away. Material is leather like, firm and has a texture design. It suits well on a countertop or end table. It is not petite.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Color: Black, Size: Small
This is great to store multiple remotes in a small footprint clearing up table room. My 6 year old Grandson loves it also keeping remotes in one area. He operates the TV also. We loved it so much we bought a second for another room.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for me.
Color: Black, Size: Small
I was a little trepidatious before opening it all up and checking out the holder. I didn't know whether or not the larger remotes I had would fit. How would it work for the bulky / longer TV and Universal Remotes. It worked perfectly.
The holder is small enough to use on a small side table next to the couch. And it's very simple to access. The living room now looks like a living room...rather than Radio Shack gone biserk.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Very good quality.
Color: Black, Size: Small
So nice to have for keeping my stuff organized. Easier to keep track of my remotes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Simple but does the job
Color: Black, Size: Small
Simple and does the job. Sturdy as well to hold my remotes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026