Pay in installments of $37.50 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 29 - Oct 4
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Upgraded Rear Tinted Windshield for Can-Am Maverick X3 / X3 MAXDESCRIPTION Enhanced Sealing Upgrade your Can Am Maverick X3 with the KEMIMOTO rear tinted windshield. It offers superior protection by effectively preventing wind, mud, dust, and debris from entering the cab, reducing dust by at least 80%. Additionally, it helps retain warmth in cold weather. Noise Reduction and UV Protection Enjoy quieter rides with enhanced sealing and shock absorption from integrated rubber strips, which reduce airflow into the
DESCRIPTION
Enhanced Sealing
Upgrade your Can-Am Maverick X3 with the KEMIMOTO rear tinted windshield. It offers superior protection by effectively preventing wind, mud, dust, and debris from entering the cab, reducing dust by at least 80%. Additionally, it helps retain warmth in cold weather.
Noise Reduction and UV Protection
Enjoy quieter rides with enhanced sealing and shock absorption from integrated rubber strips, which reduce airflow into the cab and minimize noise. The tinted windshield also blocks direct sunlight, providing effective UV protection for a more comfortable driving experience.
Durable Material
Built from 1/4 inch thick polycarbonate, the KEMIMOTO rear windshield is 250 times stronger than glass, ensuring exceptional durability and resistance to cracking or breaking. Its UV-resistant layer further protects against oxidation.
Easy Installation
The package includes all necessary hardware and an installation manual for a quick and hassle-free setup. Remember to remove the protective film after installation to keep the windshield scratch-free.
Note: Does Not Work With X3 Rear Rack And Spare Tire Carrier.
FITMENT
Compatible with 2017-2025 Can Am Maverick X3 and X3 Max all models (Except XMR because of the snorkel, unless you modify it.):
For 2-Seater Models:
- Can-Am Maverick X3 900 : 2018
- Can-Am Maverick X3 900HO : 2018
- Can-Am Maverick X3 DS Turbo : 2021-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 DS Turbo R : 2020-2021
- Can-Am Maverick X3 DS Turbo RR : 2022-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 RS TURBO : 2024-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 RS Turbo R : 2020-2021
- Can-Am Maverick X3 RS Turbo RR : 2022-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 Turbo : 2017-2020
- Can-Am Maverick X3 Turbo R : 2017-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X DS Turbo R : 2017-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X DS Turbo RR : 2020-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo : 2018-2021
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo R : 2018-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo RR : 2020-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo RR 64 : 2022-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RC Turbo RR 72 : 2022-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RS Turbo R : 2017-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RS Turbo RR : 2020-2023
- Can-Am Maverick X3 X RS Turbo RR with Smart-Shox : 2021-2025
For 4-Seater Models:
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX DS Turbo : 2021-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX DS Turbo R : 2020-2021
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX DS Turbo RR : 2022-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX RS TURBO : 2024-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX RS Turbo R : 2020-2021
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX RS Turbo RR : 2022-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX Turbo : 2018-2020
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX Turbo R : 2017-2029
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X DS Turbo : 2017-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X DS Turbo R : 2017-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X DS Turbo RR : 2020-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X RC TURBO RR : 2024-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X RS Turbo R : 2017-2019
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X RS Turbo RR : 2020-2025
- Can-Am Maverick X3 MAX X RS Turbo RR with Smart-Shox : 2021-2025
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Only holds towels in place when it is full or 1/2 full
Color: 01-silver
If you are buying this for the feature of holding the paper towels in place so you can just rip one, I think you will be disappointed. Once the roll becomes smaller (and I tried changing the arm) the arm does not touch the towels. I do like the firm grip on the counter. My other dissatisfaction is the base gets water spots. Being near the sink this happens frequently. It does its job and is attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stylish
Color: 01-silver
Good sturdy stand for paper towels. Has small suction cups on bottom for stability. Good finish and good fit under the counter. Heavy base and not flimsy feeling. Brushed aluminum matched other appliances well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Required Reading for Egyptologists
Format: Paperback
To say the very least, this book is an enlightening read. The author attempts to design a new chronology of Egypt based on a number of archaeological observations he made which pointed to certain anomolies in the standard chronology of the Third Intermediate Period of Egyptian history. The TIP is one of those points in history where information is scanty and there is much room for error in interpreting existing archaeological evidence. Rohl posits that the 21st and 22nd pharaonic dynasties were at least partly contemprary in a period of balkanization of Egypt, contrary to the conventional chronology's view that they were successive. He therefore shifts the entire preceding dynastic histories downward from 200 to 300 years. That is, what we previously though to occur at 1250 BC actually happened at 1000 BC according to Rohl. In so doing Rohl has done much to synchronize Egyptian chronology with the chronology of the bible.
Rohl claims that the Amarna letters were not to be compared to Joshua's conquest of Canaan, a period where they clearly do not fit, but rather tell the tale of Saul's and David's claiming of Israel from Phillistine Egyptian vassals. He synchonizes Ramesses II's conquests of Asia Minor with the biblical invasion of Shishak. Also, he identifies the Egyptian 'Hyksos' with the Amalekites of the book of Exodus. There are many other enlightening points of connection with the bible that Rohl makes, but my point here is not to explain them all.
The true value of this book for any egyptologist, student of biblical history, or any student of the ancient world at all, is this book's popular presentation of the field of archaeology and ancient history. So rare are books that actually connect a lay reader with the methodologies and evidence upon which researchers base their works. In order to show a need for a revision of Egyptian chronology, Rohl shows how the entirety of Egyptian chronology depends on all but of a handful of archaeological finds, many of them of dubious reliability. Even if Rohl's opponents find more pieces of evidence supporting the standard chronology, the number will still be very small and they will quite likely be as subject to interpretation, as are the ones that Rohl has pointed out. Rohl goes to great lengths to show the history of the observations that scholarship has made, thereby showing us where they may have gone wrong. (As a popular book, I must confess that parts of Rohl's historical narratives depict events in which one expects to find Indiana Jones) Next, when building his own chronology, Rohl puts us close to the texts and archaeological evidence upon which he bases his theories. Rohl's conclusions are in many cases impressive, but in some cases I had to shake my head and come to the conclusion that he was grasping at straws. For instance, I believe that his work in astronomical retrocalulations to find the dates of eclipses recorded in ancient texts is pretty shaky. I even doubt that the text that he is talking about is even mentioning an eclipse. This information has proved to be incredibly valuable to me, however, as I now know that astronomy based chronology, something I though would give absolute and undisputable dates, is as foggy an area of research as any.
I do not know if I will eventually embrace Rohl's ideas or not, or if partially. I do know that reading this book has shown me the types of reasoning and observations that old world historians make, and can now make an informed decision about how firm our grip on dating events of the past is. My conclusion: if somebody tells you some biblical event did not happen because the dates don't line up with scientific knowledge, don't be disheartened. We have a LONG way to go before we can truly be confident about such statements, if indeed we will ever arrive at that sort of knowledge. This uncertainty that I have gained from Rohl's book is corroberated by the "Oxford History of Ancient Egypt" which provides wonderful information on Egyptian chronology.
Everyone who wants to study ancient history, whether it be Egyptian, biblical, Middle Eastern, or even Chinese for that matter, should read this book, so the next time they read somewhere that 'such and such happened at 3200 BC', they will know to take that statement with a grain of salt. Whether Rohl is right or not, I am forever indebted to him for showing me how chronologists operate.
Lastly, I would like to say, after all this talk about archaeology and methodology of Egyptologists, that this book is very readable and comprehensible to the lay reader. Though a smattering of knowledge of biblical and/or Egyptian history will make the book more interesting to the reader, no such knowledge is required in order to understand the book or find value in it. It is truly a popular book intended for the average interested person. I recommend it to all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2001
★★★★★ 5
Exciting reinterpretation of ancient history.
Format: Paperback
In "Pharoahs And Kings", author David Rohl offers the reader a stunning new interpretation of the events of the ancient world in Egypt and the Levant. In doing so, he ties in Biblical events to their proper place in history. This is a stunning reordering of events and personalities and brings both Egyptian and Biblical history to a much closer synchronization.
The book begins in Egypt where Rohl lays out his evidence for condensing the chronology of Egypt. Though we use AD/BC as a method of numbering our years, the ancients did not do so and used regnal dates ("In the third year of Pharoah So-And-So's reign, something happened."). By counting all Pharoahs and their reign lengths, historians felt they had a handle on when, according to our dating system, things happened. When they did so, they discovered the events portrayed in the Bible didn't match. When they date Solomon's reign in Israel to the Iron Age, for example, they find economic development to be poor - a far cry from the Biblical accounts of Solomon's reign as a flowering of culture and rich in trade. Likewise, Jericho's walls did not fall in the time period most historians would place the Exodus and entrance into the Levant of the Hebrews. Therefore, the Biblical accounts are simply myth, nothing more.
David Rohl is a historian, not a religious believer and his point of view is as a historian. His focus is to find a more accurate timeline for the events in the ancient Middle East. He begins in Egypt because that is his area of expertise and he gives convincing arguements for re-ordering the events of Egypt. The clincher, for me, was the tombs of Tanis (among other inconsistencies in the conventional dating such as the number of Apis Bulls) in which the tomb of Psusennes I cuts into the tomb of King Oskoron II and was obviously built after the tomb of Oskoron II. The problem? Oskoron II was from the 22nd dynasty while Psusennes was from the 21st! It is quite obviously reversed! Rohl's conclusion is that two dynasties were contemporary and that about 140 years needs to be removed from the timeline of Egypt.
When this is done, events in the Levant match the events in the Old Testament very closely. In the New Chronology, Jericho falls just when the Hebrews are entering Canaan according to the Bible. Solomon's Israel is now placed in the Late Bronze Age where there is evidence of prosperous cities and flourishing trade. There is evidence of mentions of both Saul and David in the Amarna Letters.
This was a page turner and Rohl's work, although controversial, is backed up by fact and evidence. There is less evidence for some of his conclusions than others (in my mind), but it is well researched and never strays from a scholarly interpretation of the evidence written and on the ground.
I actually enjoyed this book! David Rohl writes in a very engaging fashion, often using humor. His writing skill keeps subjects that may seem dull very frsh and exciting. He often uses humor and engages the reader, challenges the reader and forces the reader to think. This is not the usual dry tome on archeology that puts you to sleep! He assists the reader with many and high quality photos and drawings of the evidence and includes "side bars" with definitions and explanations in the margins to help the layman navigate the technical aspects of history and archeology without getting bogged down and overwhelmed.
This is a fine book and more than deserving of five stars. It's a very eye-opening and interesting read that doesn't seem like a college textbook. Instead, he challenges the reader while entertaining at the same time. I recommend this book with five stars!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2012