SKU: 52648993271

Pro+ Brake System Rear 4142042GB

Sale price$1507.47 Regular price$1674.97
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $418.74 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 30 - Oct 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Pro+ Brake System Rear 4142042GBFits Rear Ends w Dana 60 or Mopar 8 3 4" Car Housing Ends Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Axle Rear Axle Flange Dana 60, Mopar 8

Fits Rear Ends w/Dana 60 or Mopar 8-3/4" Car Housing Ends


Features:

  • 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
  • CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
  • Powder Coated Finish
  • Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
  • Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
  • Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
  • 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat

Specs:

Axle Rear
Axle Flange Dana 60, Mopar 8-3/4"
Brand Baer Brakes
Caliper 6P
Caliper Color Grabber Blue
Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity 6
Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type Fixed
Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number D0731
Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction Vented
Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter 13.000IN
Emission Code 6
Export Description Brake Components
Grade Type Performance
Hose Material Stainless Steel
Includes Park Brake Yes
Includes Park Brake Cables No
Lug Count 5 Lug
Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) 17IN
Product Line 13 Inch Pro+
Product Type 13 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit
Prop 65 (C, R or CR) CR
Prop 65 - Long Label WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
Prop 65 - Short Label WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
Prop 65 Yes/No Yes
Rotor Thickness 1.100IN
Rotor Type 2-Piece
Surface Type Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated
System Notes Fits Dana 60/Mopar 8.75" car housing ends. Fits standard and Green Bearing conversions.
Template Q082H
Title Pro+ Brake System Rear
Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern 5x4.50/5x4.75
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 52648993271

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S. Langley
New York, US
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
New York, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025

recommand products