SKU: 36321456498

GEPRC GEP-CT30 Frame

Sale price$108.86 Regular price$120.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $30.24 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 25 - Jul 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

GEPRC GEP-CT30 FrameThe GEP CT30 frame specially developed by GEPRC team for cinematic enthusiasts is now officially released. As a cinematic FPV frame, the new series of GEP CT30 frame using high precision 7075 T aircraft grade aluminium alloy bracket for FPV camera escort. The newly polished gimbal damping module can easily fix high frequency vibration and jello issues. It can be mounted with multiple action cameras which have stable and clear images, and its easy to

The GEP-CT30 frame specially developed by GEPRC team for cinematic enthusiasts is now officially released.

As a cinematic FPV frame, the new series of GEP-CT30 frame using high-precision 7075-T aircraft-grade aluminium alloy bracket for FPV camera escort. The newly polished gimbal damping module can easily fix high-frequency vibration and jello issues. It can be mounted with multiple action cameras which have stable and clear images, and it’s easy to film. GEP-CT30 frame supports the installation of mainstream AIO flight controllers with 25.5mm*25.5mm mounting holes, and is compatible with various VTX mounting holes on the market such as 20mm*20mm/25.5mm*25.5mm. With 12mm * 12mm motor mounting holes, can be installed with larger 15-18-20 series motors, with strong power output with 3-inch propeller. Ultra-light fuselage weight for more confident flying.

Adopts high-strength one-piece injection-molded propeller guard and high-toughness and impact-resistant PC material for injection moulding. A ring-shaped Cob light strip is embedded in the propeller guard, and the light effect is carefully tuned. Light strip kits are optional for flexible options. 7075-T aircraft-grade aluminium column, finely polished frame design, only 6 screws need to be removed to separate the aircraft top plate and propeller guard. Easy to cope with the urgent need to replace the accessories, at any time to restore the state.

Tuned by GEPRC professionals with high-qualityproduction process, explore endless possibilities for your flight shooting. In the face of the headwind, we only go up to the wind, never go with the wind. Salute to the filmmakers!

Features

  • Design that combines engineering and aesthetics.
  • Quick-disassembly design, only need to remove 6 screws to upgrade or replace parts.
  • Selected high-toughness and impact-resistant PC +PET material for injection molding.
  • Aviation 7075-T aluminum alloy camera mounting bracket and fuselage aluminum column.
  • Propeller guard embedded ring Cob light strip, carefully tuned light effect. Color brightness in the day and night can be clearly displayed.
  • The newly developed gimbal shock absorption structure can disintegrate high frequency jitter and jello effect. Easily carry a variety of action cameras.
  • Compatible with a variety of fpv system with the program, choose to belong to your first-person view.

Specifications

  • Brand: GEPRC
  • Model: GEP-CT30
  • Motor to Motor: 127mm
  • Isolation Plate: 2.0mm
  • Main Plate: 3.0mm
  • Bottom Plate: 1.5mm
  • FC Mounting Hole: 25.5mm x 25.5mm
  • VTX Mounting Hole: 20mm x 20mm /25.5 x 25.5
  • Motor Mounting Hole: 12mm x 12mm
  • FPV Camera Spacing : 19mm
  • Suitable Propeller Size: 3 inch propeller
  • Weight: 103.2g (including propeller guard, 3D printed parts, Naked GP8 camera base mount, antenna tube)

Includes

  • 1 x Main Plate 3.0mm
  • 1 x Bottom Plate 1.5mm
  • 1 x Isolation Plate 2.0mm
  • 1 x Set of Screws
  • 1 x Bec Module (optional)
  • 1 x Cob Light Strip (optional)
  • 1 x Set of 3D Printed Parts
  • 1 x 3 inch One-piece Injection-molded Propeller Guard
  • 1 x Naked GP Camera Base Mount
  • 2 x Battery Non-slip Mat
  • 2x Receiver Antenna Tube 100mm
  • 1 x Battery Straps M15*200
  • 1 x Battery Straps M15*220
  • 1 x Naked GP Camera Power Cable 4S Balance Head
  • 1 x Naked GP Camera Power Cable 6S Balance Head
  • 1 x L-shaped Screwdriver 1.5mm
  • 1 x L-shaped Screwdriver 2.0mm
  • 1 x Carbon Fiber Keychain
  • 2 x GEPRC Stickers
  • 1 x Service Card
  • 1 x Packaging Box

Browse more

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 36321456498

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
A
Amy Sullivan
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Provocative and fascinating read
Format: Paperback
Justin Driver's excellent book makes the case that conservatives may come to regret the Supreme Court's 2023 decision striking down affirmative action in college admissions. He argues that, rather than simply check a box to indicate their race, the decision will force non-white applicants to "perform their trauma" in application essays in ways that conservatives may find even more corrosive. And affluent non-white candidates--the people conservatives say should not be benefiting from affirmative action--will be the ones best-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity, since they are most equipped to exploit the loopholes and work-arounds that the Roberts decision created. A truly provocative read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025

recommand products