Pay in installments of $40.75 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 13 - Aug 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Original Waldemar Swierzy Poster, 11th International Poster Biennale Warsaw - 1986Artist: Waldemar SwierzyDimensions: 98x68 cm Year of print: 1986Condition: Excellent Feast your eyes one of our captivating designs of Waldemar Swierzy showcased in this original 1986 poster promoting the 11th International Poster Biennale in Warsaw (XI Miedzynarodowe Biennale Plakatu Warszawa 1986). Established in 1966 at the 'Zachta' galleries, the International Poster Biennale emerged as the world's first recurring international event dedicated to
Artist: Waldemar SwierzyDimensions: 98x68 cm
Year of print: 1986
Condition: Excellent
Feast your eyes one of our captivating designs of Waldemar Swierzy showcased in this original 1986 poster promoting the 11th International Poster Biennale in Warsaw (XI Miedzynarodowe Biennale Plakatu Warszawa 1986).
Established in 1966 at the 'Zachęta' galleries, the International Poster Biennale emerged as the world's first recurring international event dedicated to the poster field. Originally conceived by Polish graphic artists, it was spearheaded by Eryk Lipiński and overseen by Prof. Józef Mroszczak for many years, with continuous support from Prof. Henryk Tomaszewski. Since 1990, Prof. Lech Majewski, the current President of the International Poster Biennale, has played a pivotal role in its organization. After a stint at the Poster Museum at Wilanów from 1994, the Biennale returned to its roots at the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw in 2018.
The aftermath of World War II marked the genesis of the Polish School of Posters, a revolutionary era in Polish poster art. Commissioned by the newly installed Communist regime, artists were tasked not only with conveying social and political messages but also with promoting various aspects of government-run cultural media such as concerts, exhibitions, film, jazz, opera, theatre, and the circus (cyrk in Polish). While artists adhered to guidelines on messaging and rejected Western values, they enjoyed artistic freedom, resulting in bold and unique designs infused with individual personality, wit, and subversive commentary. Laden with metaphors and symbolism, crafted with handcrafted typography, the posters of the Polish School of Posters significantly influenced the global landscape of graphic design. These highly original designs, characterized by their contemporary appeal, continue to garner admiration to this day.
(*) Waldemar Świerzy (1931 - 2013) was an internationally acclaimed Polish graphic designer specializing in commercial graphic images and poster art. His work is part of the MoMA collection in New York and has garnered significant awards, including the Grand Prix Tolouse-Lautrec in Paris in 1959, 1st prize at the Sao Paulo Biennial in 1969, Silver Medal at the 4th International Poster Biennale in Warsaw in 1972, Gold Medal at the 6th International Poster Biennale in Warsaw in 1976, 1st Prize at the 2nd International Biennial of Posters in Lahti, Finland, in 1977, Gold Medals in 1965, 1971, 1975, 1989, and Silver Medals in 1977, 1987, 1995, 1999 at the Polish Poster Biennials in Katowice, Poland. Additionally, he received Hollywood Reporter's Awards for the poster in 1975 and 1985, Gold and Bronze Medals at the International Jazz Salon in 1985, and won twelve Prizes of the Year in the 'Best Warsaw Poster' competitions.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 30 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Almost perfect
Color: White
Stainless steel. Holds a large quantity of milk (enough for two). Works well with alternative milks. Easy to clean. Easy set up and instructions. Frothing, heating, cold foam, and hot chocolate options. Perfect temp.
Not 5 stars because of the constant high pitched squeel sound it makes. Almost enough to make me return it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 2, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Hot cocoa every morning!
Color: White
I absolutely love this machine. I make my hot cocoa every morning with it. It is so easy you just put the milk in and high-quality hot chocolate mix. Push the button and then it just whips it up and gives it a little bit of a froth on the top when it’s finished. It’s so fast and easy.
It would be a great gift for anybody that likes hot chocolate.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Best way for hot chocolate
Color: Black
works great, I use it for hot chocolate. Easy to clean. Something to consider though the Max light may be a little lower than shown depending on the milk you use.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Check your milk preference when buying this unit. Product Does not last
Color: White
I purchased this frother in mid Oct and less than 90 days later, it's no longer working. The wisk does not spin, and the element does not heat the milk. I am currently working with customer support on a refund / replacement, but so far not happy. I've been told it does not work with 2% organic milk and that I need to switch to whole milk, which will solve my issues. Not sure how whole milk will help with the heating element? This was not disclosed when I purchased the unit. If I had known my milk choice would impact the frother, I would have chosen another brand or product. I like the unit, it's compact, easy to clean, but it did not last.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Still The Best Frother Ever!
Color: Black
I love how it is easy to use, how it holds a charge, and how much power it has. I've only charged it once since I got it & I've been using it on a daily basis!!! Though it isn't a long time, I'm happy with it so far! I definitely will recommend it to anyone looking for a great frother. If you are looking for one, look no further! You won't be disappointed! I've read some comments where they found it to be too strong that their drink spilled everywhere. But for me I have not had any incident of spilling over. I have used it both for my coffee and my matcha tea and it worked great without any spilling over. You just have to start with the lowest power and ensure that you have a large enough container to have a room for your frothing. My sister tried to use it recently during her visit to make us matcha tea. However, she experienced spillage all over the cup, because she had used a small cup. Otherwise, she liked it very much and said she will get one when her battery operated one stops working...
Another thing I like about the product was the customer service that I had received. When I got my first order which came quickly, it wasn't working after having charged it over 24 hours. It was not turning on at all. I returned it and ordered a replacement which I received within a day or two. This time after charging it for the recommended amount of time, I was a bit skeptical when I turned it on. However, I was pleasantly surprised that it worked like it was supposed to and it has been working ever since having charged it only once so far. I may come back and give an update depending on how it does after 6 months of use, so keep in tune...
I don't know if there is a way to write a new entry as a follow up to the old entry, so I'm going to add my follow up comment over here.
May 23, 2025 - I love my frother more than I can say in words. It's functionality has not changed a bit from the time I have purchased it. It charge lasts several weeks to few months before I charge it again and the power is still the same. Recently I decided to buy another one for my office use. I like the white color and so tried it but that one wouldn't even turn on. And then I got a gray one to have a different color. That one was much weaker than the black one I own. Then I replaced it with another gray one within few days. I tried it and it was exactly the same as the one I already replaced. So then I decided to go with a black one again hoping that it would be the same as the one I have. The black one did much better than the gray ones in the strength or power of the frother. However, it is weaker than the one I already have been using since last August. While I am not very happy with the quality being inconsistent in all of the ones I have tried including the recent pictures of the black one, I have decided to keep the black one because it is relatively better than the gray ones I tried. What I don't understand is why there is inconsistency in the quality of the same product by the same maker. I am beginning to wonder if the black one I purchased in Augusta last year was anomaly of a quality and a good way. Maybe I lucked out on my older black frother, but I'm unsure if quality is going to get better if I were to order another one. I have a sister who is a pro in making coffee drinks and she was the reason I had ordered this frother to begin with. She uses a battery operated one at this time and I have been thinking about getting her one like mine. While I am still skeptical, I am going to give it a shot and order her one sometime soon. If it doesn't work, I guess we will return it back. But one thing that I am grateful is that I have been able to return every one of those that I have tried recently with no issues. I hope that I don't have to return my most recent purchase in black. I was not even able to review the new purchase because of the item being the same color which is crazy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 8, 2024