Pay in installments of $418.74 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1982-1992 Camaro Pro+ Brake System Front 4301334RFits 1982 92 GM F body Cars (Camaro Firebird) (Comes Assembled on Stock Height Spindles) Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs:
Fits 1982-92 GM F-body Cars (Camaro/Firebird) (Comes Assembled on Stock Height Spindles)
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | GM F-Body 82-92 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Front |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Red |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Front) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Front) Type | Fixed |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Front) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Front) Outside Diameter | 13.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | Comes Assembled on Stock Height Spindles |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Spindles | Yes, Stock Height |
| Lug Count | 5 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 17IN |
| Product Line | 13 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 13 Inch Pro+ Front Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.100IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Comes pre-assembled on modified stock spindles |
| Template | Q082H |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Front |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 5x4.75 |
| Wheel Stud Size | M12-1.50 x 51.5mm |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1982-1992 | Chevrolet | Camaro | |
| 1982-1992 | Pontiac | Firebird |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Size: 30 Count (Pack of 4)
Only just received, so I haven't had the chance to test them. So far they are compatible with my skin and easy to use.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Buyer beware. For your sake read my review please.
Size: 30 Count (Pack of 4)
I loved the smell which can be kind off setting especially if unscented. However the love kind of stopped there. The size of the wipe it self was not much than one of those wipes you get at the BBQ store with dinner. I do not wear foundation or heavy makeup however I had to use 3 wipes each time before I felt my skin was clean. I was excited to have the different issues of my skin dealt with as far as anti-aging, pore refining etc but there was not a single bit of difference between the wipes other than the scent which again was very spa like and pleasant. Easy to like. Small wipe. Need several. By the time you add up the added cost of the extra towels each day and I could have purchased a much higher quality product. I don't forget to look at reviews very often, but this time they sounded so positive and I went ahead and purchased. Sorry I ever did but glad I didn't order two or three due to the sale on them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great for sensitive skin!
Size: 30 Count (Pack of 4)
Works really well. No burn. I have very sensitive skin and these have been great. Not overpowering.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Very nice product
Size: 30 Count (Pack of 4)
I absolutely love these facial wipes. I used the Pore Refining pack first and noticed a change in my pores after about a week of use. I'm over 60 and as we age our pores start to get a little bigger and this wipe closed them up. I'm very pleased with this facial wipe. They are small, so I use a different facial wipe to get make up off then use the Pore Refining wipe to go over my face again. I haven't used the other three types of wipes you get in this 4-pack, but look forward to see any results from them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Indispensable!
Scent: Unscented, Size: 25 Count (Pack of 4)
I love these so much that they are part of my monthly subscribe-and-save program. They have absolutely no scent, which is great, because too many products are over-perfumed. They take off all of my makeup gently. There is no stinging or drying sensation. The cloths are well-sized and the package stays shut when not in use- the cloths do not dry out. After I use a couple of these each night to take my makeup off, I follow up with a gentle, moisturizing facial cleanser. My skin is soft, clean, and happy. I highly recommend these!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2020