Pay in installments of $26.12 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
P06248-B22 HPE® compatible Direct Attach Copper Breakout Cable 200GBase-CU QSFP56 to 2x100GBase-CU QSFP56 (Passive Twinax, 1.5m)P06248 B22 HPE compatible Direct Attach Copper Breakout Cable 200GBase CU QSFP56 to 2x100GBase CU QSFP56 (Passive Twinax, 1. 5m) ATGBICS HPE compatible P06248 B22 200GBase CU QSFP56 to 2 QSFP56 Passive Direct Attach Cable operates over Passive Copper with a cable length of 1. 5m. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. It is suitable for short reach connection between 200G QSFP56 and 100G QSFP56 enabled host adapters, switches,
P06248-B22 HPE® compatible Direct Attach Copper Breakout Cable 200GBase-CU QSFP56 to 2x100GBase-CU QSFP56 (Passive Twinax, 1.5m)
ATGBICS HPE® compatible P06248-B22 200GBase-CU QSFP56 to 2 QSFP56 Passive Direct Attach Cable operates over Passive Copper with a cable length of 1.5m. This product operates within a commercial temperature range. It is suitable for short reach connection between 200G QSFP56 and 100G QSFP56 enabled host adapters, switches, and servers in 200G interconnecting networking applications and provides a cost-efficient way to connect hardware within close proximity racks. This breakout cable connects to 1 x 200G QSFP56 port on one end and to 2 x 100G QSFP56 ports on the other end.
Our product meets the specification of HPE® P06248-B22 and we proudly offer a compatibility guarantee and limited lifetime warranty. Our rigorously tested products record a unique traceable serial number and are fully compliant with all MSA (Multi-Source Agreement) and IEEE standards & protocols.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 23 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Favorite socks
Size: Medium, Color: Black/Assorted
These are my go to socks! Love these. Great towards sweat and different weather temperatures. Mostly use for working out and love them. Will be getting more!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Nothing goes wrong with UA
Size: X-Large, Color: White
Nice and comfortable for easy wear. Great offer for this price and hope this work for many as it did for me.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
They look just like the photo...fit and feel great!
Size: Large, Color: White/Gray (6 Pairs)
No complaints on these. They fit great, are supportive cotton, and look great. I was so used to the cheap Wal-Mart-bought fruit of the loom (think) ankle socks that I had no idea what I was missing. These are thicker, made better, and feel great. They even support the back of your foot from riding against your shoes. Because they are a bit thicker, they do make my feet hotter than before...but I've adjusted the shoe I wear to allow more breathability and don't wear them for long periods anyway. I live in Texas...we wear flip flops most of the year round. :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2020
★★★★★ 5
Love Underarmour!
Size: Large, Color: White (6-pairs)
Why did you pick this product vs others?:
Love underarmour products! Very comfortable. Love them for golf season.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 18, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Run large
Size: Large, Color: White/Gray (6 Pairs)
They seemed larger than the last time I ordered. I should have ordered medium
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2025