SKU: 27254766936

Sir Alfred Munnings "After The Race, Cheltenham" c1951 Colour Lithograph Printed by Frost & Reed London

Sale price$484.65 Regular price$538.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $134.62 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 25 - Aug 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Sir Alfred Munnings "After The Race, Cheltenham" c1951 Colour Lithograph Printed by Frost & Reed LondonA "Homelovers" print By permission of the Southampton Corporation, owners of the original painting Print Sz: 20 1 4"H x 25 3 4"W Frame Sz: 27 1 2"H x 33 1 2"W VG Scroll Down for (9) Additional Scans: Breaking with the two hundred year historical tradition of racing compositions featuring a horse galloping across the finishing line, Munnings brought to the portrayal of the racing occasion a revolutionary freshness and brilliance. His focus was directed

A "Homelovers" print

By permission of the Southampton Corporation, owners of the original painting

Print Sz: 20 1/4"H x 25 3/4"W

Frame Sz: 27 1/2"H x 33 1/2"W

VG

Scroll Down for (9) Additional Scans:

Breaking with the two-hundred-year historical tradition of racing compositions featuring a horse galloping across the finishing line, Munnings brought to the portrayal of the racing occasion a revolutionary freshness and brilliance. His focus was directed towards the minutes prior to the start of the race; the preparations for saddling and the dramatic moments as the horses and jockeys jostled for an advantageous starting position. However, Munnings's interests also lay in the direct aftermath of a race, scenes not usually depicted before. ‘The one subject of all that I longed to put on canvas was to be called “After the Race”.’ (Munnings, The Finish, p. 284.)
‘The subject I wanted to paint was of unsaddling… A winter afternoon with bright sun…many horses are returning after a steeplechase. With extended nostrils and quivering tails they come to a stand; the jockeys, dropping their reins, dismount and unsaddle, and all too soon the steaming horses are led away and the scene is ended. … The principal figure in the scene I wanted to paint was a jockey about to dismount… and the horse was a grey.’ (op. cit., pp. 284-5.)
However, as with so many of his racing pictures, Munnings struggled to capture the scene exactly as he saw it in his mind’s eye, creating four different versions of it. Two others are in museum collections: a similar sized picture at Southampton Art Gallery, UK; and a larger version (40 ¾ x 63 ¾ in.) forms part of The Paul Mellon Collection at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, in Richmond. The final variant was only 30 x 40 in. and is currently untraced.
While in each of the known versions the grouping on the left showing the bay horse being unsaddled, ears pricked and neck taught with nervous energy, remains the same, the pose of the grey horse is significantly altered in the present work. Here the grey appears more weary after a strenuous run, with neck stretched low and ears back. The colors of the jockey are also changed from yellow silks in the other compositions to the light blue and pink of Lord Astor’s colors.
William Waldorf, 2nd Viscount Astor (1879-1952) was one of the pre-eminent owner-breeders during the first half of the 20th century. His horses were trained, without exception, by Alec Taylor, known as the ‘Wizard of Manton’, who ran the historic Manton stables near Marlborough. The Astor family were important patrons of Munnings, commissioning a number of works from the artist over his career and helping establish his reputation during the 1920s and 30s.
As the jockey in After the Race, Cheltenham is wearing Astor’s colors it seems more than likely that the present work is the second of the ‘After the Race’ series. In his memoirs Munnings recalled that while for the first canvas he used a horse of his own, the second was painted at Manton using a dark grey horse of Sir Victor Sassoon’s. ‘A lad in colours posed on him in the act of dropping the reins before dismounting.’ (op. cit., p. 285.)
The backdrop for the painting is the enclosure at Cheltenham. The inauguration of the Gold Cup in 1924 popularised Cheltenham racecourse, regarded as challenging due to its undulating and variable ground. The race is now a major feature of the British sporting calendar, and is regarded as the pinnacle of jump racing. Munnings first attended the Cheltenham March Meeting in 1920 while on his honeymoon with his second wife Violet, staying at the Lygon Arms in nearby Broadway. It was the first of many visits, and the course also became the inspiration for one of Munnings’s most celebrated saddling enclosure paintings, The Saddling Paddock, Cheltenham March Meeting (c. 1947, Private Collection).
We are grateful to Lorian Peralta-Ramos, Tristram Lewis and the Curatorial staff at The Munnings Museum for their assistance in preparing this catalogue entry.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 27254766936

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
B
Verified Purchase
Butch M.
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Fantastic Shoe for the Price
Size: 9.5 Wide, Color: Wingtip Black
Okay, I’m used to spending big bucks on men’s dress shoes. I’m talking $300 plus for American made shoes. They are recraftable (resole-able) for another $100 each time. But since Covid, I don’t go to the office as often. One of my black dress shoes needs to be re-soled, and it will be. Just not now. So I ran into these shoes on Amazon. It’s hard to argue with the price. Literally 10% of what I have been paying. So, are these shoes 90% lower in quality? The short, simple answer is, surprisingly, no. Just the opposite. Upon receipt, I inspected them carefully and they looked pretty darned decent. I was looking for any excuse to plop them back in the box and return them. I couldn’t find anything. I appreciate that the leather upper is smooth and mildly shiny. This is a wing tip style shoe, so I’m impressed that the extensive stitching was evenly spaced. The leather detailing that I expect on a wing tip is also all there. Inside the shoe, it is lined from the toes all the way to the heel box… nice! And that leather feels surprisingly supple. That is something I would expect on a much more expensive shoe. But definitely not at this price point. Hmm. I even liked the wax laces they chose. They are a little thicker and have more than adequate length. The shoe’s eyelets have interior facing metal grommets to protect against stretching and tear out of the leather and helps protect the laces against friction wear, as they are tightened and loosened over time. Now having that detail, at this price point, has raised both of my eyebrows. Double hmm. Now I am really impressed. The only thing that I didn’t like was that the stitching—that joins the uppers to the sole—is white. I needed to polish these shoes anyway, so I figured I’d see what would happen if I put black polish on the stitching. I’m happy to say that the uppers shine up very nicely, to a high gloss. This was done with just a little bit of buffing, using a traditional horse hair bristled brush. And followed by a buffing cloth. Although I didn’t do it, the leather is smooth enough that I probably could have spit shined them. And those pesky white stitches on the top side of the soles? Well I’m happy to report that they are now definitely black. Turning the shoe over, I can visually see a lump where the shank is supposed to be. That’s a good thing. Not all shoes have a shank. It helps to support the arch. That’s another nice detail. I am expecting the shank to be plastic at this price point. So I am utterly shocked to report to you that a magnet sticks to the bottom of the shoe. That shank is steel! Now I am amazed! We’re talking mind blown, Purple smoke everywhere. Speaking of details, I was very surprised to see the nicely done wing tip detailing, from on top of the shoe, carried over to the bottom of the sole. Wow. I have never seen that before. That’s surprising. Now it is important to point out that the sole is some man made material. Definitely not leather. But that’s okay. Especially in the wet, leather wears out quickly, if you don’t wear rubber over shoes. One less thing to fuss about. The heel itself has a band/layer of rust brown material sandwiched between black layers. I wonder if that is a cork or bamboo material? Having walked in these shoes, on concrete and tile floors, last week, there is a noticeable level of cush, or give. They will definitely not to be confused with sneakers. But for dress shoes, this is a pleasant and surprising experience. The first day, I wore them at home, over the weekend and I’m glad I did that. They needed time to adjust to my feet. Any dress shoe that I have ever worn needs that. But after that, these shoes have been pleasant enough to walk around in at work. I’d have to say that these shoes give me at least 90% of what I would expect from my $300+ shoes for around 10% of the cost. In my estimation, at their current price point, they constitute an excellent deal. And especially if you are just breaking into the business world and need a good pair of interview shoes, these are definitely respectable… just be sure to put black polish on the white stitches. Oh, BTW, I have wider feet and I ordered the shoe wide. After the initial stretching, they fit nicely. So, in the final analysis, what do I think? I have to say, yes, these shoes definitely get my recommendation. Especially if price is a huge factor, then these shoes constitute an excellent deal.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2023
M
Verified Purchase
Mark A Petrosino
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Very Satisfied
Size: 10.5, Color: Black
Excellent Value . Very well made shoes . Shoes were true to size ! I am going to order in Brown also !
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2026
N
Verified Purchase
Nikki
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Great dress shoe
Size: 10.5 Wide, Color: Black
Wow. Very impressed with these. Would purchase again. Comfortable enough for my teenage son, my husband and I very impressed with their look. Great for any special occasion. Ours appear to be all leather. Even the sole. These will last a lifetime if cared for.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
Richard
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 3
Ok. Not great
Size: 8.5 Wide, Color: Brown
They look great but not that comfortable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Marco Cervantes
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Great shoes
Size: 10 Wide, Color: Brown, Size: 10 Wide, Color: Brown
This shoe is incredibly comfortable and durable. I work in custodial work as management. However, sometimes I have to help my team when we are low manned. Just recently I had to help my team auto scrub a restroom. My shoes felt lightweight and were completely easy to clean. I was worried I would be slipping on sudsy water. To my surprise, these shoes gripped on to the floor nicely. I love the versatility of having a working shoe with the great style Bruno Marc provides. The shoe is breathable and true to size. I ordered the black pair as well and have had them for about 3 months. Highly recommend these amazing shoes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026

recommand products