SKU: 68944332946

SP 1074357003 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 10501 - 520 passend fuer HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR

Sale price$41.35 Regular price$45.94
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $11.48 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 27 - Aug 1

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

SP 1074357003 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 10501 - 520 passend fuer HONDA NX 500 DOMINATORSP 1074357003 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 10501 520 passend fuer HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR 1995 Stahl Kettenrder von AFAM werden aus C45 Stahl hergestellt und anschlieend gehrtet, um die Haltbarkeit und damit die Laufleistung zu erhhen. Die Fertigungsqualitt und przision seiner Ritzel macht AFAM zur weltweit anerkannten Referenzmarke in Sachen Motorrad Antriebskomponenten. Stahl Kettenrad Hochwertige Qualitt und erstklassiges Finish Verlngert die

SP 1074357003 AFAM Standard Stahlritzel hinten 10501 - 520 passend fuer HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR 1995

Stahl-Kettenräder von AFAM werden aus C45- Stahl hergestellt und anschließend gehärtet, um die Haltbarkeit und damit die Laufleistung zu erhöhen. Die Fertigungsqualität und -präzision seiner Ritzel macht AFAM zur weltweit anerkannten Referenzmarke in Sachen Motorrad-Antriebskomponenten.

  • Stahl-Kettenrad
  • Hochwertige Qualität und erstklassiges Finish
  • Verlängert die Laufleistung Ihres Ketten-Kits

- M E R K M A L -

Kettenrad Version: Standard

Kettenteilung: 520

Kettenrad Zahnanzahl: 45

Kettenrad Typ: 10501

Material: Stahl

passend für:

HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1988
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1989
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1990
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1991
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1992
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1993
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD02) 1994
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD08) 1996
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD08) 1997
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD08) 1998
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD08) 1999
HONDA XR 600 R (PE04) 1988
HONDA XR 600 R (PE04) 1989
HONDA XR 600 R (PE04) 1990
HONDA FX 650 VIGOR (RD09) 1999
HONDA FX 650 VIGOR (RD09) 2000
HONDA SLR 650 (RD09) 1997
HONDA SLR 650 (RD09) 1998
HONDA FMX 650 FUNMOTO (RD12) 2005
HONDA FMX 650 FUNMOTO (RD12) 2006
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1988
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1989
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1990
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1991
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1992
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1993
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1994
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD08) 1995
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD09) 1996
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD09) 1997
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD09) 1998
HONDA NX 500 DOMINATOR (PD09) 1999
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR (RD08) 1995
HONDA NX 650 DOMINATOR 2 (RD02) 1990

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 68944332946

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jessica
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 3
Cute but no so comfortable
I previously owned a white sperry leather shoe that I bought from Marshall’s for about $35 & absolutely them, they were so comfortable , cute & great price.After running that pair down, I decided to buy another pair and found out the shoe was discontinued. The closest thing to what I had is this, the white crest vibe in leather. I was disappointed that this shoe was not as comfortable and didn’t fit quite the same. The back ankle part of the shoe caved into my skin and hurt. Sadly, I do not recommend this shoe for much walking. I hope Sperry decides to make this shoe more comfortable because it is cute.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2021
V
Verified Purchase
Valerie Pham
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect Jeans!
Size: 26, Color: Verified Vintage, Size: 26, Color: Verified Vintage
Love these jeans, so soft and lightweight but with all the usual Levi’s class. I bought them in three different colors. They’re so well fitting and comfortable to wear. Im 5’5 140 pounds and it is true to size. The perfect fit every time.!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Audra Betzer
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Classics! Good material with no stretch.
Size: 28, Color: Verified Vintage
I am in love with these jeans. I ordered another pair in a different wash. I also sized up two sizes but I like the looser, slouchy fit.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jackie McPheeteers
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 4
Back to the 70s
I love these. They fit perfect in the waist but are roomy else where.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2025
C
Verified Purchase
Cassie
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
My favorite ever jean, I have a pair in every color
Size: 26, Color: Not My News Channel
I’m a little lanky (5’9”, 125-130lbs) and I want to like wide leg/baggy jeans so bad but every time I try them on, they look ridiculous on me. I look like a straight line in them, or they’re so baggy I feel like I’m wearing a costume. These have the baggy look I’ve been searching for for years but in an understated way that doesn’t make me feel shapeless. I’m also convinced that the buttons are more flattering over the fupa than a zipper. It’s like a hidden corset vs. a zipper that contours to your shape. If you’re in between sizes, definitely size down. Even if you’re not, you may still want to size down or buy both and return the one you don’t like
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2026

recommand products