SKU: 54863354378

hueverea frigorifico bosch balay siemens 00649479

Sale price$18.31 Regular price$20.34
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.08 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 5 - Aug 10

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

hueverea frigorifico bosch balay siemens 00649479Balay, Bosch, Siemens, Lynx Khlschrank Eierbehlter. Ersatzteil gltig fr die meisten Khlschrnke auf dem Markt Offizieller Distributor der BSH Gruppe. Referenzen 00649479, 00081433, 00080352, 00094675, 00359203, 00493408, 00050918, 00095138, 00265864, 00087561, 00266151, 00640430, 0849 Modelle: 3FC1300B KG36EBW40 KGE39XL2AR KGV39XW22R KIL32AF30 3FC1502B KG36EBW41 KGE39XL2OR KGV39XW2AR KIL42AF40 3FC1652L KG36EDI40 KGE39XW21R KI22LAF30 KIL42SD30 3FC1661P

Balay, Bosch, Siemens, Lynx Kühlschrank-Eierbehälter.

Ersatzteil gültig für die meisten Kühlschränke auf dem Markt

Offizieller Distributor der BSH-Gruppe.

Referenzen 00649479, 00081433, 00080352, 00094675, 00359203, 00493408, 00050918, 00095138, 00265864, 00087561, 00266151, 00640430, 0849

Modelle:
3FC1300B
KG36EBW40
KGE39XL2AR
KGV39XW22R
KIL32AF30
3FC1502B
KG36EBW41
KGE39XL2OR
KGV39XW2AR
KIL42AF40
3FC1652L
KG36EDI40
KGE39XW21R
KI22LAF30
KIL42SD30
3FC1661P
KG36EDL40
KGE58DI40
KI22LAF40
KIL72AF30
3FC1662P
KG36EDW40
KGE58DL30N
KI27FP60L
KIL72AF30G
3FC1663P
KG36NAW32
KGE58DL30U
KI28DA30
KIL72SD30
3KF5062E
KG36NHI32
KGE58DW30N
KI28DX30
KIL72SD30H
3KF6601W
KG36NST40
KGN36AW32
KI28FP60
KIN28P60
3KF6604W
KG36NSW30
KGN36AW32G
KI32LAD30
KIN28P60L
3KF6652M
KG36NSW31
KGN36HI32
KI32LAD30H
KIN34P60
3KF6865X
KG36NXI30
KGN36SM30
KI32LAD40
KIN86AF30
3KFE1084
KG36NXI32
KGN36SM40
KI32LAD40G
KIN86AF307
3KFL7651
KG36NXI33
KGN36SQ30
KI32LAF30
KIN86AF30F
3KFL7655
KG36NXI40
KGN36VW30
KI34VX21
KIR21AD40
3KFL7855
KG36VUW20
KGN36VW30G
KI38CP60
KIR21AD40Y
3KFW7600
KG36VUW20G
KGN36VW31
KI38CP65
KIR21AF30
3KFW7610
KG36VUW20V
KGN36VW31G
KI39FP70
KIR21AF30G
3KFW7810
KG36VUW30
KGN36VW32
KI40FP60
KIR41AD40
3KI7014F
KG36VVW32
KGN36XI30
KI41RAD40
KIR41AF20R
3KR7767P
KG36VVW32S
KGN39AI32
KI41RAF30
KIR41AF30
3KR7807B
KG36VVW32V
KGN39AI40
KI42LAD30
KIR41AF30G
3KR7867P
KG36VXI30S
KGN39AL32G
KI42LAD30H
KIR81AF30
3KSL5450
KG39EAL40E
KGN39AW22
KI51FSD40
KIR81AF30G
3KSL5655
KG39EAL42
KGN39VL31G
KI51RAD30
KIS77SD30
3KSL6855
KG39EAL43
KGN39VL32
KI51RAD40
KIS77SD40
5CL28030
KG39EAW40
KGN39VS20
KI51RADE0
KIS86AD30
5CN21020
KG39EAW40G
KGN39VW20
KI51RAF30G
KIS86AD40
5CP21020
KG39NAI22
KGN39VW21
KI72LAD40H
KIS87AD30H
5CR28630
KG39NAI25
KGN39XI42
KI72LAF30
KIS87AD40
BD2058W2VV
KG39NAI32
KGN39XI43
KI72LAF30G
KIS87AD40Y
BD2143W2VV
KG39NVI32
KGN39XI44
KI77SAD30
KIS87KF31
BD2158W3VV
KG39NVI32G
KGN49AC22
KI77VVF30
KIS87SD30
BD5772PNFI
KG39NVL20
KGN49AI22
KI77VVFF0
KIV86VS30G
CBS70200
KG39NVP20
KGN49VI20
KI77VVS30
KIV86VS30H
CBS85230
KG39NXW32
KGN49VI20R
KI77VVSF0
KIV86VS30S
CK129EW30
KG39NXW33
KGN49VW20
KI81RAD20R
KIV86VSF0
CK842AF30
KG39NXX30
KGN53AI30A
KI81RVS30G
KS36VAW41
CK842EF30
KG39NXX40
KGN57AL20U
KI81RVU30
KS36VBI30
JC77BBSF0
KG39VVL31
KGN57AL24N
KI82CAF30
KS36VBW30
JC87BB30
KG39VVW30
KGN57AW24N
KI82LAD30
KSL20AR30
K5875X4
KG39VVW30S
KGN57SB30U
KI82LAD30H
KSL20AR30C
K5876X4
KG39VVW31
KGN57SB34N
KI82LVF30
KSL20AU30
K5880X4RU
KG49NAI22R
KGN57SM30U
KI82LVS30
KSL20AW30
K5891X4RU
KG49NAI32
KGV33VL31G
KI82LVS30G
KSV36VW40
K5897X4
KG49NSW21R
KGV33VL31S
KI82LVU30
KSW36AI30
KD46NAI32N
KG49NSW31
KGV33VW30E
KI85NAD30
KSW36PI30
KD46NAI50I
KG49NVI20
KGV33VW30S
KI86NHD30
KSW36PI304
KD46NAW32N
KG57NPI20M
KGV36UL30S
KI86NKD31
KU15RA65H
KD46NVI30
KG57NPI34N
KGV36UW20
KI86NKS30
KU15RA65HK
KD56NPI32N
KG57NPW24N
KGV36VL22
KI86SAD40
KU15RA65L
KD56NSB40N
KGE366L4Q
KGV36VL30
KI86SAF30
KUL15A50RU
KD56NSW30N
KGE366W4P
KGV36VL30E
KI86SAF30G
KUL15A60
KD56NVI25U
KGE368ICP
KGV36VL30S
KI87SAD30
PKNB39VL20
KDN46AI22
KGE36DI40
KGV36VL31G
KI87SAD30H
PKNB39VL21
KDN46AI32N
KGE36DL40
KGV36VL32
KI87SSD40
PKNB39VW20
KDN46AI50I
KGE36DL41
KGV36VW32G
KI87VKS30
PKNB39VW21
KDN46AW20U
KGE36DW40
KGV36VW32S
KI87VVF20R
PKNB39XL30
KDN56PI32N
KGE39AW21R
KGV36XW31
KIF39S80
PKVB39VW30
KDN56SB40N
KGE39AW30
KGV36XW31V
KIF40P60
PKVT29VW30
KDN56SM32N
KGE39AW32R
KGV39EI31
KIF51AD30
PKVT33VW30
KDN56SQ40N
KGE39AW33R
KGV39ML30
KIF51AD40
RB280303
KDV47VL30
KGE39AW40
KGV39UL30
KIF51AF30
RB280703
KDV47VW20N
KGE39AW41
KGV39VW31
KIL22VS30G
RB280704
KG36E6I4P
KGE39AW42
KGV39VW316
KIL32AD30
RB282203
KG36E8ICP
KGE39BI40
KGV39VW31G
KIL32AD40
VVUL1520
KG36EAI30
KGE39XK2OR
KGV39XW21R
KIL32AD40G
VVUR1520
KG36EAI32G
KGE39XL21R
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 54863354378

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 29 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
D
Verified Purchase
D. Jenkins
Draper, US
★★★★★ 4
Very good, low budget blower.
For the price, this blower is very good. I had a WORX blower and mulcher, previously, that worked well, but this blower does the one thing better. I do miss the mulcher, but not the extra weight. This stand-alone blower is about 3 pounds lighter and more powerful; though, the all-in-one had more precise airflow, for the few small spots that it was beneficial for me. The build quality is so-so on this blower. It lacks what we all appreciate in our tools and devices—that sharp snap and click and clean fit when putting the pieces together. The hose attaches to the body with an imperfect and never fully flush connection. It's not going to go anywhere—it does have a latch. The pieces are not as rugged and solid as my previous WORX all-in-one, but I can guess that's what helps reduce the weight. Speaking of, I had considered the WORX WG547, cordless blower, for the weight reduction and convenience of no cord, but I was concerned with loss of power, limited usage time, and higher cost. After using this WG520 for the first time, I do desire a lighter machine, but I think I would miss the extra power and limitless usage time. If budget was not an issue, I probably would've gone with the WG546—which is a step up from the cordless WG547 I was considering—with an extra battery; but that is 3-4 times the cost of this WG520. But even that blower could not match the power of this one. It's worth noting that that power comes from a large air intake on the back that can suck in loose clothing. Cost was the number one priority for me; so I was pleasantly surprised when I found that on this low-budget machine there are variable speeds, ranging between the low to high speeds. If cost is the number one priority for you as well, without having to lose too much power capability, I can easily recommend this WG520 WORX blower.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2023
D
Verified Purchase
D. Alexander
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Buy this one, forget the rest
This is one of the most powerful handheld electric blowers available. If you're serious about getting the job done quickly, this is the baseline. The next power tier is a gas backpack blower at five times the cost, then an even more powerful backpack, and then four-digit specialty tools from companies like Billy Goat. I bought the Worx because I didn't want to spend three hours raking a half-acre of grass. My trial run was an hour of continuous use with matted wet leaves and driveway sand. It fast became apparent that to be efficient, a blower has to move leaves without being on top of them. Blowing from six inches just makes everything scatter as piles build up. You end up crisscrossing the section you just cleared to deal with the strays. The further your breeze carries, the more direct the flight path of the leaves. This range, and the ability to scour stubborn leaves from the ground, comes from air speed (MPH). At the same time, though, you need a big enough wall of air to move more than one leaf at once. That comes from the size of your pipe opening. The two multiplied together determine your total air volume over a duration, or CFM (cubic feet per minute). In physics-land (with spherical cows and turbulence-free pipes, spared from the icy hand of marketing), CFM is the best measure of a blower's work capacity. MPH, you can change by varying the size of the pipe; a smaller pipe makes a smaller column of air moving at a faster speed (and more impressive advertising), which is why a lot of consumer-class blowers have tiny nozzles. (I'm looking at you, Sun Joe SBJ601E.) But there's a cost to adding MPH: it kills efficiency. The energy to move a volume of air goes up with the square of speed, so if you design your blower for 160 MPH, you'll get half the CFM of a 110 MPH blower from the same power. Something to mull if the blower is powered by a battery. Still, if you know either speed or CFM, and the size of the pipe, you can calculate the other (assuming the manufacturer isn't misleading you by quoting CFM at the fan and MPH at the end of the pipe). To get CFM from MPH and the radius of a round pipe, the calculation is (radius^2)*(mph)*(1.92). That's (1.69^2)(110)(1.92) for this blower's 110 MPH and 3 3/8" pipe, with the result arriving right at the rated number of 600 CFM. Anyway, the Worx has enough volume and speed to blow mounds of wet leaves from six feet and dry ones from ten or more. It's impressively powerful. I was switching arms every few minutes as they wore out from the backward force. Only some really baked-on mud would have benefited from a pipe-reducer attachment. Thanks to ape-like proportions or the secure fit of my spandex leaf-blowing onesie, clothing suction from the rear-directed air intake hasn't been a bother. ALTERNATIVES: I almost bought Toro's highly-rated "Ultra" combination blower to minimize bagging, but the vacuum functionality didn't seem that useful in videos. Maybe it'd be adequate to clean an enclosed deck area or a small yard with a scattering of dry leaves. For a larger yard, it looks like a time sink relative to a standalone mulcher. Likewise the blowing capacity, which, at 410 CFM, trails the Worx by quite a lot. Cordless tools were also tempting. There's a 20V DeWalt people seem to like that's rated at (a perhaps optimistic) 400 CFM. Because it's a similar fan design to the Worx, we can compare power directly. DeWalt's standard battery is 20V (or so we'll stipulate; it's closer to 18V under load) and 5 amp-hours, so we're looking at 100 watt-hours total output. 15 minutes of runtime translates to a sustained draw, best case, of 400W. Assuming 90% efficiency in the brushless motor, that's 360W actually moving air. (When new. Expect a performance drop over time and battery replacements by year three.) Compare this Worx: 12 amps at 120V equates to 1440 watts sustained, in this case feeding a 2-pole AC/DC motor that's perhaps 55% efficient. 12A is close to the maximum a device can reasonably expect from a typical 15A household socket. Even with nearly half of our power lost to heat and noise, the remaining 790W is over double what the DeWalt can manage. It's no coincidence that 600 CFM cordless blowers (Greenworks and Kobalt come to mind) have 80V/2.5Ah batteries with twice the DeWalt's capacity. Their runtime at full tilt? The same fifteen minutes, with three extra pounds to lug around from a chunk of lithium that costs more than the blower it attaches to. And what of gas blowers? The handheld versions have around 1 HP with CFM from 450 to 500. They're usually tuned for higher MPH than the Worx, so they're likely to be a little better with wet leaves and a little worse with dry ones. Backpack blowers up the displacement and make between 1.5 and 5 horsepower. The models that you might find on the back of a professional landscaper can manage nearly 1000 CFM with speeds around 200 MPH. That's a considerable difference, but you pay for it at the checkout and in weight: figure 10 pounds or so for a handheld (relative to 7ish for this unit, plus some cord) and 20 or more for a backpack. As of mid-2020, two other corded blowers are worth a hard look: Toro's F700 and Worx's WG521. The Toro arrived first in 2019 with a hefty 720 CFM rating, a bigger two-arm handle, and a better cord retention mechanism. The WG521 is the response: 800 CFM and 135 MPH (claimed) from a ~4" nozzle, albeit still intended for one arm. All three blowers are beastly and often close in price; pick whichever best channels your inner Tim Allen. ACCESSORIES: A motor this powerful benefits from a thick (low gauge) cord for longer runs. You lose a bit of performance with thinner cord. The generic orange 50-foot extension everyone has is 16-gauge. Feeding a 12A load for 50 feet, it'll have a voltage drop of about 5V. Heavier 14-gauge loses 2.5V on the same run, and industrial 12-gauge, only 1.5V. The scale is linear, so if you double up that 16-gauge cord for a 100-foot run, you'll lop off 10V. How's that play out here? From a short and fat cable (that the cheesy plastic strain-relief piece won't actually accommodate; just tie an overhand knot over the two plugs instead), we'd expect a 1440W draw (12A * 120V, or a bit less because the house wiring itself has some drop). Losing 5V drops the total to 1380W. That's about what I found when I tested the Worx with a watt meter. 12ag / 3 ft = 1423W 14ag / 100 ft = 1352W 16ag / 50 ft = 1351W 16ag / 50 ft + 14ag / 100 ft = 1280W With the progressive thumb dial at the lowest setting, minimum draw was 260W. For shorter runs, disconnect extensions you don't actively need. Every cable sheds a percentage of the energy it carries to heat. As above, skinny cables lose more. Coiled on the ground and coupled with a high-load device like the Worx, they can build up enough heat to start melting insulation, which tends to cause sheepish expressions and insurance claims. This blower is also loud enough to merit hearing protection. On an A-weighted scale (approximating human hearing), measured outdoors from three feet, it makes 82 dB on low and 91 dB on high. Indoors or near a wall, volume jumps by 10 dB and subjectively doubles. While the sound character emulates a vacuum, my Shark only measures 72 dB indoors; you'd have to run over a rat's nest of lamp cords to make one this loud. Amazon has a number of comfortable muffs for less than a Jackson that'll keep your ears intact. You can find electric blowers with more toys, but few that'll get the job done as fast as this one. It's a bargain at the asking price. I'll update if I catch any reliability problems.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2016
R
Verified Purchase
R. Klein
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Light, and easy to use for blowing leaves
I bought this in the fall of 2025, and found it very easy to use. I also have a Toro blower/vac, that I use to grind up leaves in the fall. While this appliance is only good for blowing leaves, it does a good job of it. It's quieter than the Toro, and considerably lighter in weight. I find it much less fatiguing on the hand than the Toro. It has multiple speeds, so is versatile. You don't ALWAYS want maximum wind from these things, depending on the job and the space. The weight, comfortable handle, balance, and lower noise are the top advantages to this machine. Because this is a corded model, there's no concern over battery life. You can blow the afternoon away without a care. Only time will tell when it comes to durability. 🤞🏻
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Teng Ma
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Power for the Price
Really impressed with this blower. It’s lightweight, easy to handle, and has plenty of power to clear grass and leaves quickly. Perfect for quick yard cleanups. Definitely worth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2026
O
Verified Purchase
Over and Under
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
The Black and Decker BESTA510 is a KEEPER plus it's made in the USA 🇺🇲
Style: String Trimmer
Well folks🙂 I have to tell you this has been a nice weed eater that cuts really good and it's LIGHTWEIGHT and it's powerful👍 and at a PRICE that can't be beat...it's way more powerful than some battery and electric weed eaters that I have.. like a Ryobi... And supposedly a commercial grade Ryobi $200 😤.. Anyway 🙂 This electric weed eater is very good and I'll take that PEPSI challenge any day 😀 when comparing it to some other weed eaters PLUS it doesn't USE LINE like other electric weed eaters that I've used.. at least that's been my experience.. This is a KEEPER weed eater from Black & Decker👍....it handles tall grass and even some hedge... though it probably shouldn't be used for hedge but it's TOUGH 😀 and better than any battery weed eater I used especially with the power and cutting... The power alone and convenience of NOT rushing through the job with the battery pack and charging ect imo is worth the cord drag 🙂... and much better than a battery weed eater or other electric weed eaters.. This just cuts better 👍... With MORE power consistently and constantly through the whole job... So in conclusion 🙂 the Black & Decker BESTA510 weed eater in my opinion is a KEEPER and this model has been around for a while which speaks for itself not to mention Black & Decker has been around for years.... This weed eater OVERALL (pound for pound ) is a solid performer with many mostly liking this weed eater and Black & Decker products overall.. Thanks for reading🙂.. I hope my review helps... and Did I mention It's made in the USA...🇺🇲..🙂...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 6, 2025

recommand products