Pay in installments of $50.94 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 14 - Aug 19
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
C2220 K SKFTechnische Basisdaten Auendurchmesser: 180 mm Auendurchmesser: D: 180 mm ueres Breitenma: 46 mm ueres Breitenma: B: 46 mm Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 49 kN Gewicht: 4740 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 4 800 r min Hersteller: SKF Innendurchmesser: 100 mm Innenlagerluftfaktor: k2: 0. 11 Kantenabstand: r12: min. 2. 1 mm Referenzdrehzahl: 3 600 r min Schiefstellungsfaktor: k1: 0. 108 Erweiterte technische Daten 180 mm Auendurchmesser 46 mm ueres Breitenma A negative
Technische Basisdaten
| Außendurchmesser: 180 mm |
| Außendurchmesser: D: 180 mm |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 46 mm |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: B: 46 mm |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 49 kN |
| Gewicht: 4740 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 4 800 r/min |
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Innendurchmesser: 100 mm |
| Innenlagerluftfaktor: k2: 0.11 |
| Kantenabstand: r12: min.2.1 mm |
| Referenzdrehzahl: 3 600 r/min |
| Schiefstellungsfaktor: k1: 0.108 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 180 mm Außendurchmesser |
| 46 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß |
| A negative value for Ca is theoretical. |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Außendurchmesser 180 mm |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß 46 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 415 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 415 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 4.74 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 4 800 r/min |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Referenzdrehzahl 3 600 r/min |
| Statische Tragzahl 465 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 465 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171505 |
| Zulässige axiale Verschiebbarkeit: max.10.1 mm |
| eClass-Code 23-05-09-13 |
| max.10.1 mm Zulässige axiale Verschiebbarkeit |
| max.2 mm Radius der Rundung |
| min.2.1 mm Kantenabstand |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Decent polo
Size: X-Large, Color: Red
Decent quality, I ordered XL which fit loose until I washed/dried it now it fits pretty good. I will say the neck hole is rather large compared to my more expensive polos
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect Red for Pentecost!
Size: Large, Color: Brick Red
This polo is the perfect fit for my athletic, 67 year old husband. We wanted to wear red to Church for Pentecost, and this scarlet red matched my dress, perfectly!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Could be 5 but it’s 3 stars
Size: Small, Color: Bright Emerald Green
These polos considering the price and more than decent quality in general, are easy 5 stars plus… however quality control needs to step it up.. these shirts are hits and misses and you never know what your going to get. This green polo was a miss. The left shoulder has an overlap on the seam at the should and sleeve of which creates a horn like effect when wearing the shirt. Looks like the outfits worn by villains in the power rangers series. But like I said, can easily be 5+ stars and even on this defective shirt, the material is very good for the price. I recommend these polos but just expect a few will defective.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent
Size: Medium, Color: Black
I’m happy with this product. Good quality and worth the money. Would recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good
Size: Large, Color: Black
Cheap and good quality
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2026