Pay in installments of $11.22 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 5 - Aug 10
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
PWTR2052-2RS-XL INATechnische Basisdaten Abdichtung: 2RS GummiAbdichtung: beidseitig Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0645599040000 PWTR2052 2RS Auendurchmesser: 52 mm Abdichtung: Doppelte Lippendichtung Gewicht: 311 Gramm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten 2RS Rubber Seals At Each Side Of The Bearing, Temperature Range 30 ~ 120 ueres Breitenmae: mm 52,00 ueres Breitenmae:(B) mm 24,00 Drehzahl bei dauerhafter Fettlagerung (n D G) "3800. 0000" ECLASS number
Technische Basisdaten
| Abdichtung: 2RS – GummiAbdichtung: beidseitig |
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0645599040000 PWTR2052-2RS |
| Außendurchmesser: 52 mm |
| Abdichtung: Doppelte Lippendichtung |
| Gewicht: 311 Gramm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 2RS Rubber Seals At Each Side Of The Bearing, Temperature Range -30 ~ 120℃ |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 52,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 24,00 |
| Drehzahl bei dauerhafter Fettlagerung (n D G) "3800.0000" |
| ECLASS number 23-05-15-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-15-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.321 |
| Innenmaße: mm 20,00 |
| XL X-Life |
| Anschlag-Ø Anlaufscheibe: 27 mm |
| C 0r w 35.500 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r w 27.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur w 4.350 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| D 52 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Drehzahl Dauerbetrieb Fettschmierung: 3.800 1/min |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 27.000 N |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 4.350 N |
| F 0r per 35.500 N Zulässige statische rad. Lastaufnahme |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,5 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 35.500 N |
| Zulässige statische rad. Lastaufnahme: 35.500 N |
| d =2 27 mm Anschlag-Ø Anlaufscheibe |
| n D G 3.800 1/min Drehzahl Dauerbetrieb Fettschmierung |
| r 1 min 0,5 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,311 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
GENIUS IDEA !❤
I'm a nurse and on my feet for 10 hours a day. I wear nursing clogs but really don't like to wear socks. I feel like they smother my feet. These allowed me to wear socks but have my toes free and it feels wonderful!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 28, 2021
★★★★★ 4
They're okay
A bit tight, but do the job
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for Dry Heels
I'm at the house all day and run around without shoes on, so these fit my needs perfectly. I bought these socks because I'm applying lotion to my dry heels and wanted to cover them up afterwards. At the same time, I didn't want to cover up my toes because that's a good way to get toenail fungus.
The quality is good, and I like that these socks aren't real thick or too thin. They seem like they'll hold up well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2020
★★★★★ 5
Avid runner loves these socks
My sister, who runs every day, specifically requested these for a present because they are comfortable, well-made, and durable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2024
★★★★★ 3
Too tight
The socks are soft and pretty. They fit further down on the foot than I expected. However, they do not cover toe halves, which is what I was looking for. They were not comfortable, but they would be good for getting a pedicure.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2024