SKU: 28884067834

COLOURLOCK "Leather Colour" (Ford) — Lederstandardfarbe für Ford

$78.04 $86.71
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on sm10m.ch >

Pay in installments of $21.68 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

COLOURLOCK "Leather Colour" (Ford) — Lederstandardfarbe für FordCOLOURLOCK Leather Colour fr Ford: originale Standardfarbe fr werkstreue Lederreparaturen Was ist COLOURLOCK Leather Colour fr Ford? Die passgenaue Lederstandardfarbe ermglicht originalgetreue Farbauffrischungen und Reparaturen an Ford Ledern und sorgt fr ein dauerhaft gleichmiges, werkstypisches Finish. COLOURLOCK Leather Colour (Ford) ist eine exakt abgestimmte Lederstandardfarbe fr die professionelle Reparatur, Auffrischung und Neufrbung von Ford

COLOURLOCK Leather Colour für Ford: originale Standardfarbe für werkstreue Lederreparaturen

Was ist COLOURLOCK Leather Colour für Ford? — Die passgenaue Lederstandardfarbe ermöglicht originalgetreue Farbauffrischungen und Reparaturen an Ford-Ledern und sorgt für ein dauerhaft gleichmäßiges, werkstypisches Finish.

COLOURLOCK Leather Colour (Ford) ist eine exakt abgestimmte Lederstandardfarbe für die professionelle Reparatur, Auffrischung und Neufärbung von Ford-Lederinterieurs. Die Farben basieren auf originalen Ford-Farbmustern und sind so formuliert, dass sie sich harmonisch in bestehende Oberflächen einfügen. Ideal für Sitzwangen, Lenkräder, Armlehnen, Türverkleidungen und alle pigmentierten Glattleder im Fahrzeuginnenraum, bei denen Farbtreue und OEM-Optik entscheidend sind.

  • Originale Ford-Farbtöne – Entwickelt nach werksnahen Farbmustern.
  • Für Reparatur & Auffrischung – Ideal bei Abrieb, Ausbleichung und Farbverlust.
  • Professionelles Finish – Optimale Haftung und gleichmäßiges Farbbild.

💡 Praxistipp Detailing1-Werkstatt: Bei uns in der Werkstatt sehen wir bei Ford-Aufbereitungen häufig dasselbe Problem — Farbverlust an Sitzwangen und Lenkrädern wird mit billigem Pflegespray überdeckt, das hält keine vier Wochen. Mit Leather Colour (Ford) im Mikrofaser-Pad in 2–3 dünnen Schichten getupft, dazwischen 30 Min trocknen, am Schluss mit Top Coat Dull versiegelt — Ergebnis hält 2–3 Jahre wie ab Werk.

Vorbereiten, dünn auftupfen, mit Top Coat versiegeln

Leather Colour (Ford) wird in 2–3 dünnen Schichten aufgetragen, dazwischen 30 Min trocknen, am Ende mit Top Coat versiegeln. Dünne Schichten halten Jahre, dicke Schichten reißen.

Vor dem Farbauftrag wird das Leder mit Lederreiniger gewaschen und mit Plastic Cleaner oder Reinigungsalkohol entfettet. Tiefe Risse und Abriebspuren werden mit Filler oder Super Filler ausgeglichen und mit 1000er Schleifvlies glatt geschliffen. Die Ford-Farbtöne werden anschließend mit Mikrofaser-Pad aufgetupft, mit weichem Pinsel ausgewischt oder bei großflächigen Reparaturen mit Sprühflasche aufgetragen.

Nach kompletter Durchtrocknung von mindestens 4 Stunden wird mit Top Coat versiegelt — Dull für matt-originalen OEM-Look, Glossy für mittleren Glanz, High Gloss für maximale Brillanz. Ein Liter Leather Colour deckt etwa 8–10 m² Lederfläche, eine 250-ml-Flasche reicht für ein komplettes Sitzpaar inkl. Lenkrad. Der gleiche Workflow funktioniert für alle Bauteile vom Sitzkissen über Türverkleidung bis zur Mittelarmlehne.

Pigmentleder ja, Naturleder und Wildleder nein

Leather Colour (Ford) ist ausschließlich für pigmentiertes Glattleder geeignet — den Standard im modernen Automotive-Bereich. Naturleder, Anilinleder und Wildleder reagieren anders und brauchen andere COLOURLOCK-Produktlinien.

Die wasserbasierte Formulierung verbindet sich mit der Pigmentschicht moderner Automotive-Leder, bleibt elastisch und geht Lederbewegungen ohne Rissbildung mit. Bei Naturleder oder offenporigem Anilinleder zieht die Farbe ungleichmäßig in die Faser ein und verfärbt das Leder fleckig — hier kommen Leather Fresh (Ford) als Pflege-Variante oder spezielle Anilin-Linien zum Einsatz. Wildleder, Velours und Alcantara werden mit Nubuk Fresh (Ford) behandelt, das die raue Faserstruktur erhält statt sie zu verkleben.

Wenn die Farbtreue zur originalen Werksfarbe entscheidend ist und das Bauteil großflächig restauriert werden soll, ist Leather Colour die richtige Wahl. Wenn nur eine kleine Stelle (Lenkrad-Abrieb, einzelner Riss) repariert werden muss, ist Fluid Leather (Ford) in der 20-ml-Tube ergiebiger und präziser. Wenn das Leder nur leicht ausgeblichen wirkt, reicht Leather Fresh als Pflege-Variante meist aus.

Für Aufbereiter, Werkstätten und Old- und Youngtimer-Halter

Leather Colour (Ford) ist die professionelle Wahl für Aufbereiter, freie Werkstätten und ambitionierte Halter, die Werterhalt und originale Ford-Farbtreue über schnelle Pflege-Lösungen stellen.

Bei Leasing-Rückläufern, Gebrauchtfahrzeug-Aufbereitungen und Old- und Youngtimer-Restaurationen entscheidet die OEM-Farbtreue über Werterhalt und Verkaufspreis. Der professionelle 4-Schritt-Workflow (Reinigen, Schleifen, Färben, Versiegeln) braucht 4 Stunden inkl. Trocknung pro Bauteil und liefert ein Ergebnis, das 2–3 Jahre wie ab Werk hält. Ein Liter Leather Colour kostet etwa 30 Cent pro 100 ml verarbeiteter Fläche — Werkstattkalkulation inklusive Top Coat liegt bei rund 12 Euro pro Bauteil.

Für reine Pflege-Routinen ohne Werkstattwerkzeug ist Leather Colour overkill — dort reicht Leather Fresh (Ford). Für Punktreparaturen am Lenkrad oder einzelne Risse sind Fluid Leather oder die Leather Care Sets (Ford) wirtschaftlicher. Wer aber komplette Sitzwangen, Lenkräder oder Türverkleidungen restaurieren möchte und auf originale Ford-Farbtreue Wert legt, kommt an der 1-Liter-Flasche oder dem 250-ml-Gebinde nicht vorbei.

Verfügbare Ford-Farbtöne (Auswahl)

Dark Ivy Green Metallic, Biscuit, Black, Blue, Charcoal Black, Cognac, Ebony, Ice Stone, Light Stone, Windsor Black, Belmont, Ceramic, Espresso, Rouge Noir, Light Sand, Derby Tan, Gray, Hazelnut, Black Ruby, Louis Verona Saddle, Cashmere, Java, Oasis, Dark Grey

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 28884067834

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 6 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
F
Verified Purchase
Fnord Fjamily
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Essential Commentary, I Use it Every Time
Format: Hardcover
I won't write an exhaustive review, but I can easily commend this commentary to any seminary student by saying this: it goes into my pile of reference books for nearly every paper I write, on any subject. It's always relevant. If I'm dealing with any New Testament text, it's worth looking up in this commentary to see if it has an OT basis, if it's an allusion, a quote, or something similar. This adds dimensionality and thoroughness to my treatment of the NT, putting it in perspective. There is a similar volume, which I use just as often, called 'Commentary on the Old Testament Use of the Old Testament.' For OT studies, I use it along with 'The Context of Scripture' (which is basically ANET with cross-indexed biblical passages and ancient texts). There have been a few times when I've followed the chain all the way from NT text -> NT use of OT -> OT text -> OT use of OT -> Context of Scripture. If you're a Bible nerd, you can imagine this is basically cause to run around the neighborhood six times shouting 'Hallelujah' while the neighbors scratch their heads or close their blinds. I use this book as much as NICNT for NT studies, which is to say, any time I study the NT. This commentary is amazing, it earns its footprint on my booksehelf. Absolutely recommend it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Brian
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
A much needed resource!
Format: Hardcover
A phenomenal and much needed resources for the church today! I am delighted that it is now part of my theological library.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026
I
Verified Purchase
InHisHand
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Pastoral Use of Beale's and Carson's Commentary
Format: Hardcover
This book was properly NOT entitled "Commentary on the New Testament Exegesis of the Old Testament." It is a well studied and scholarly look at how the New Testament writers made USE of the Old Testament Scriptures. And they did make use of those Scriptures is varied and instructive ways. Beale and Carson have compiled and edited articles from numerous trustworthy believing scholars which explain where, how, and why specific passages of Old Testament texts were employed by NT authors. These articles are careful to cite OT and NT contexts, predominant Middle Eastern scholastic thought prior to the 1st Century, and provide an analysis of what style was likely being used by the NT author (for example: typology, compare / contrast, poetic / emotive, prophetic fulfillment, simile, and at times even exegetical / interpretive). Such varied approaches by the NT authors to acquiring and working with OT passages begs the question of whether we ought to handle the OT in the same manner as did they. This commentary fairly well states that the answer is, "Yes...but." Yes, if we were to be as careful as they in understanding that we are not always merely quoting and interpreting the OT nor making absurd allegories of the OT texts but using them as instructive examples, poetic bursts of emotion, and historical typographic illustrations then we should indeed use the OT in the same way. Often the articles and entries in the commentary are long. This is not a dictionary and does not lend itself to quick reference lookups. Such attention to detail and depth enhances the experience of using this volume as it unearths elements and aspects of the Old Testament references that we rarely attempt to see from a 1st Century perspective today. Its overall format is rather straightforward. Identify a NT passage and look it up in the commentary in the passage's traditional Protestant biblical order. Generally only OT passages that are directly quoted, paraphrased, alluded to, or cited by the NT are expanded upon in the commentary. If an OT passage is merely somewhat similar to or has only surface resemblances with an OT passage (giving one the feeling that it is being brought to mind for evocative or emotive reasons alone) then the commentary may not touch on it. In general this is a very useful collection of articles. Its heart is not on being a commentary on the entire New Testament but is focused most narrowly on how the New Testament writers put the Old Testament to work to illustrate Jesus as the Christ, the evils of rebellion and sin, and the complex intricacies of God's epic sweeping salvific plan for humanity.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2012
S
Verified Purchase
Shane
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 4
Good, But Realize Its Limits
Format: Hardcover
I agree with the other reviewers who spoke highly of this resource. It is a fine resource for NT studies. However, realize that it isn't really a commentary like most of us are used to (in my opinion, the title is a little misleading). Rather, it is only a commentary on the NT texts that clearly quote OT texts. The book does not comment on entire NT books, but only some select verses. For example, I used this book studying Mark and it only discussed around 30 phrases from the Gospel of Mark - those verses in Mark that are clear OT citations. I wasn't able to use it in Mark studies as much as I had hoped. I realize this is what the book is supposed to do, and it does it very well. Just remember it won't be useful for NT texts that aren't OT quotes. This isn't a critique, just an observation for those interested. You won't be able to use this resource all the time, but it's helpful for those NT texts where an OT citation is found. FYI, I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 because the citations in the articles are not footnotes, but contained in the articles themselves [It looks like this: (eg. R.P. Martin 1974: 97; O'Brien 1982: 151; Hubner 1997a: 91; Gnilka 1980: 168; Barth and Blanke 1994:357, etc.)]. Some citations are very lengthy, which makes it quite cumbersome to read at times. Also, this is subjective I suppose, but I didn't like the font at all (it seemed too tight). All in all, this is a good book for what it does - just realize what it does before you buy it and you won't be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2013
E
Verified Purchase
Eric Stampher
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Can't ask for more, but I want more.
Format: Hardcover
Really, this is just a start. Any commentary is. But this is one of the best because it proceeds from a radical premise: the whole Bible is from God, giving His point of view and superceding that of the human author. Not that this is promoted self-consciously or consistently from each contributor. But the structure of the enterprise is such that they are sucked back into presenting how it is that the old testament is so thoroughly imbued in NT writings, including in ways which both OT and NT writers could not have intended. Treading down this path forces us to question all those teachings we've had where we were told: "Matthew (or Paul or John ...) here had in mind xyz." When Matthew wrote his gospel, we might now surmise that we can't be sure what he himself had in mind, because what we wrote was superintended to the degree that Matthew's sinful thoughts were NOT what ended up on parchment. God's thoughts are there, pure and untainted by Matthew's natural limitations and sin. Attempts to work from Matthew's sinful thoughts and culture to God's meaning miss the point that whatever Matthew was in his head was NOT the end product that flowed out his quill. Remember when Caiaphas spoke what he thought naturally about how it is better for one man to die rather than the whole nation take a hit? He meant it for evil, but God superintended it to be ultimate truth, regardless of that speaker's intent. Same with all holy writings. Yes, holy men of old spake as they were moved, but their holiness does not naturally come out in uncontaminated speech -- that takes a special work of God. This commentary allows for that premise. There's something way more than human going on that ties this whole Bible together in one theme from one Writer. Don't get me wrong, not all these contributors seem to subscribe to my radical conclusions above, although I think the editors do. And their prescribed structure for this commentary nudge the contributors into a path that I think leads to a more theocentric authorship. So this is a good start, but nothing beats trying to read the Bible itself from God's point of view, rather than the hallowed and misguided grammatial-historical human focused approach.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2008

recommand products

Parking Moltó 11411 5 tier stand
42.60
Kelim | 181 x 132 cm | Nr. 12-468015
125.00
Kelim | 295 x 218 cm | Nr. 12-473405
340.00
Baby doll RosaToys Bubbles 35 cm
28.10
Kelim | 179 x 127 cm | Nr. 12-468058
120.00