Pay in installments of $43.14 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 10 - Aug 15
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
22320-E1-XL-C4 FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0190008200040 22320 E1 C4 ueres Breitenma: 73 mm Gewicht: 12100 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Innendurchmesser: 100 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 215,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "3300. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 73,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 73,00 C4 Bearing Internal Clearance Greater Than C3 E1 Increased Capacity Design ECLASS number 23 05 09 11
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0190008200040 22320-E1-C4 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 73 mm |
| Gewicht: 12100 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Innendurchmesser: 100 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 215,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "3300.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 73,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 73,00 |
| C4 Bearing Internal Clearance Greater Than C3 |
| E1 Increased Capacity Design |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-11 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 12.1 |
| Innenmaße: mm 100,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C4 Innenluft (größer als C3) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 810000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 920000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "2380.0000" |
| Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung |
| XL X-Life |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Pretty Colors to Encourage Me to Walk!
Size: X-Large, Color: (601) Bittersweet Pink / Stone / Stone
Hum. Extra large does not seem extra large. I have a slender but size 10-10.5 foot. Will keep but was hoping for a looser fit. Bought to match an Under Armour walking outfit.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Socks
Size: X-Large, Color: (601) Bittersweet Pink / Stone / Stone
So cute
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great no show socks
Size: Small, Color: (725) Oxford Brown / Oxford Brown / Black
Very comfortable and perfect fit for my small feet. I love the full coverage sock feel with a totally no show sock.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great no shows for people with larger feet
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Some of my favorite socks!! Great quality, fit, and material. I love that they don't slip down in my shoes, especially considering I have larger feet. I also love that Under Armour offers larger sizes in their socks considering everyone in our household has much larger feet than others.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Best liner socks EVER
Size: Medium, Color: (348) Silica Green / Silica Green / Hydro Green
I have them in every color and used to get them from Sams, but they stopped selling them and I was lucky to find them on Amazon. Got all colors again. They stay, it's all I'm gonna say! And don't show in any of my tennis shoes. Absolutely love them and wear them until they get holes. They last a LONG time too. They're on the thin side and my foot loves them because they tend to get hot. There's no shrinking, they wash great with exception of the white ones I couldn't manage to keep white - they turned a bit greyish.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026