Pay in installments of $29.67 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 25 - Sep 30
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
6321-C4 FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0167244450040 ueres Breitenma: 49 mm Gewicht: 8050 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 225,00 Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "4050. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 49,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 49,00 C4 Bearing Internal Clearance Greater Than C3 ECLASS number 23 05 08 01 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 01 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 8. 05 Innenmae: mm
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0167244450040 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 49 mm |
| Gewicht: 8050 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 225,00 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "4050.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 49,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 49,00 |
| C4 Bearing Internal Clearance Greater Than C3 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-01 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-01 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 8.05 |
| Innenmaße: mm 105,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C4 Innenluft (größer als C3) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 188000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 150000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "4450.0000" |
| Spezialbehandlung Keine Spezialbehandlung |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great shoes
Size: 6 Toddler, Color: Brown
Perfect for little ones
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great kids sandals
Size: 9 Toddler, Color: Taupe
These are cute and my kids say they’re comfortable! We got a few colors. Definitely would purchase again. They’ve got good quality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Super wide
Size: 13 Little Kid, Color: Taupe
They are oddly very wide. Great for kids with wide chunky feet but for us it was not cute
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Nice but runs small
Size: 7 Big Kid, Color: Navy
The sandals are nice and not to hard or flimsy but they are cut very small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Solid Kids Sandals, Overpriced Like Most Kids Shoes 🌞
Size: 11 Little Kid, Color: Brown, Size: 11 Little Kid, Color: Brown
My son hasn’t worn these yet since it’s December in Indiana and sandals + snow obviously don’t mix. 😂 So this review is based on first impressions rather than long term wear.
That said, these seem wider than a lot of typical kids’ sandals, which I REALLY appreciate since we tend to have wider feet in our family. #hobbitfeet
The quality feels pretty decent overall. They’re described as lightweight, and while they’re not insanely lightweight, they do have enough weight to feel semi-sturdy and not flimsy or cheap. I like the style and color, and I think they’ll work well for my son once warmer weather hits.
My main complaint is the price. At just under $24 at the time of this review, it feels a little high for kids’ sandals and for what these are. I really feel like $20 MAX would make more sense. Kids shoes are almost always priced like adult shoes, even though they clearly use less material, and that’s hard for me to understand and wrap my mind around. Overall, these seem solid for daily wear, I just wish the price was a bit more reasonable and affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 31, 2025